After Colonial

This dialogic and conversational work reflects on artistic method of two artists who share migratory and diasporic experiences. The authors met and became collaborators on two transnational dance projects (Field I and Colonial) scafolded within their conversation the logic, ethic, and politics of transnational collaboration by engaging in a dialogic exchange. In this conversation both authors generate self-reflexive discourse on the ethics and aesthetics of transnational co-creation of dance and theatre projects that connect Canada and the Philippines. By looking at art making and circulation as modes of intervening in and reworking the world, the authors render possible aparatus of an ethical collaboration between artists of varying migratory subjectivities. In this article, both artists reflect on the implications of cultural appropriations, capitalism, and colonialism in contemporary performance ecologies in Canada and the Philippines. As artists who have extended histories of education, theatrical practice, community engagement and living in British Columbia, this article offers the following dialogue as critical intervention in decolonizing performance based theory and practice by historizing, exploring, and unpacking dance and theatre praxis within the diasporic Filipino communities in Canada. Authors argue that for transnational connection and collaboration to ethically emerge it requires critical attention to the uneven distribution of material resources. Along with this is a consistent reflexivity on ethical considerations of the unequal power relations between collaborators who are part of the ensemble of these collaborations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Collections
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14288/bcs.no227.200655
Primary Topic
Diversity and Impact of Dance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

After Colonial

Dennis Gupa, Alvin Tolentino
Open Collections
Diversity and Impact of Dance
article

After Colonial

Dennis Gupa, Alvin Tolentino
article en

Abstract

This dialogic and conversational work reflects on artistic method of two artists who share migratory and diasporic experiences. The authors met and became collaborators on two transnational dance projects (Field I and Colonial) scafolded within their conversation the logic, ethic, and politics of transnational collaboration by engaging in a dialogic exchange. In this conversation both authors generate self-reflexive discourse on the ethics and aesthetics of transnational co-creation of dance and theatre projects that connect Canada and the Philippines. By looking at art making and circulation as modes of intervening in and reworking the world, the authors render possible aparatus of an ethical collaboration between artists of varying migratory subjectivities. In this article, both artists reflect on the implications of cultural appropriations, capitalism, and colonialism in contemporary performance ecologies in Canada and the Philippines. As artists who have extended histories of education, theatrical practice, community engagement and living in British Columbia, this article offers the following dialogue as critical intervention in decolonizing performance based theory and practice by historizing, exploring, and unpacking dance and theatre praxis within the diasporic Filipino communities in Canada. Authors argue that for transnational connection and collaboration to ethically emerge it requires critical attention to the uneven distribution of material resources. Along with this is a consistent reflexivity on ethical considerations of the unequal power relations between collaborators who are part of the ensemble of these collaborations.

Open Collections
The University of Winnipeg (CA), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Diversity and Impact of Dance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.