Effects of Flight and Processing Parameters on UAS Image-Based Point Clouds for Plant Height Estimation

Point clouds and digital surface models (DSMs) derived from unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery are widely used for plant height estimation in plant phenotyping and precision agriculture. However, comprehensive evaluations across multiple crops, flight altitudes, and image overlaps are limited, restricting guidance for optimizing flight strategies. This study evaluated the effects of flight altitude, side and front overlap, and image processing parameters on point cloud generation and plant height estimation. UAS imagery was collected at four altitudes (30–120 m, corresponding to 0.5–2.0 cm ground sampling distance, GSD) with multiple side and front overlaps (67–94%) over a 2–ha field planted with corn, cotton, sorghum, and soybean on three dates across two growing seasons, producing 90 datasets. Orthomosaics, point clouds, and DSMs were generated using Pix4Dmapper, and plant height estimates were extracted from both DSMs and point clouds. Results showed that point clouds consistently outperformed DSMs across altitudes, overlaps, and crop types. Highest accuracy occurred at 60–90 m (1.0–1.5 cm GSD) with RMSE values of 0.06–0.10 m (R2 = 0.92–0.95) in 2019 and 0.07–0.08 m (R2 = 0.80–0.89) in 2022. Across multiple side and front overlap combinations at 60–120 m, reduced overlaps produced RMSE values comparable to full overlaps, indicating that optimized flight settings, particularly reduced side overlap with high front overlap, can shorten flight and processing time without compromising point cloud quality or height estimation accuracy. Pix4Dmapper processing parameters strongly affected 3D point cloud density (2–600 million points), processing time (1–16 h), and plant height accuracy (R2 = 0.67–0.95). These findings provide practical guidance for selecting UAS flight and processing parameters to achieve accurate, efficient 3D modeling and plant height estimation. By balancing flight altitude, image side and front overlap, and photogrammetric processing settings, users can improve operational efficiency while maintaining high-accuracy plant height measurements, supporting faster and more cost-effective phenotyping and precision agriculture applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18020360
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Flight and Processing Parameters on UAS Image-Based Point Clouds for Plant Height Estimation

B. Fritz, C. Yang, Charles P.-C. Suh
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Effects of Flight and Processing Parameters on UAS Image-Based Point Clouds for Plant Height Estimation

B. Fritz, C. Yang, Charles P.-C. Suh
article en

Abstract

Point clouds and digital surface models (DSMs) derived from unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery are widely used for plant height estimation in plant phenotyping and precision agriculture. However, comprehensive evaluations across multiple crops, flight altitudes, and image overlaps are limited, restricting guidance for optimizing flight strategies. This study evaluated the effects of flight altitude, side and front overlap, and image processing parameters on point cloud generation and plant height estimation. UAS imagery was collected at four altitudes (30–120 m, corresponding to 0.5–2.0 cm ground sampling distance, GSD) with multiple side and front overlaps (67–94%) over a 2–ha field planted with corn, cotton, sorghum, and soybean on three dates across two growing seasons, producing 90 datasets. Orthomosaics, point clouds, and DSMs were generated using Pix4Dmapper, and plant height estimates were extracted from both DSMs and point clouds. Results showed that point clouds consistently outperformed DSMs across altitudes, overlaps, and crop types. Highest accuracy occurred at 60–90 m (1.0–1.5 cm GSD) with RMSE values of 0.06–0.10 m (R2 = 0.92–0.95) in 2019 and 0.07–0.08 m (R2 = 0.80–0.89) in 2022. Across multiple side and front overlap combinations at 60–120 m, reduced overlaps produced RMSE values comparable to full overlaps, indicating that optimized flight settings, particularly reduced side overlap with high front overlap, can shorten flight and processing time without compromising point cloud quality or height estimation accuracy. Pix4Dmapper processing parameters strongly affected 3D point cloud density (2–600 million points), processing time (1–16 h), and plant height accuracy (R2 = 0.67–0.95). These findings provide practical guidance for selecting UAS flight and processing parameters to achieve accurate, efficient 3D modeling and plant height estimation. By balancing flight altitude, image side and front overlap, and photogrammetric processing settings, users can improve operational efficiency while maintaining high-accuracy plant height measurements, supporting faster and more cost-effective phenotyping and precision agriculture applications.

Remote SensingVol. 18(2)
Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.