A comparison of different clinical diagnostic criteria for adhesive restorations in children aged 5 to 10 years: a cross-sectional observational study.

The results of the present study demonstrated an increased shift of treatment decisions towards aggressive interventions (repair/replacement) for restored tooth surfaces/restored primary/permanent teeth as per modified USPHS criteria, with fewer interventions indicated using FDI, followed by the CARS criteria. Future pediatric restorative protocols should incorporate standardized training modules for practitioners and researchers to interpret criteria uniformly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6859268
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of different clinical diagnostic criteria for adhesive restorations in children aged 5 to 10 years: a cross-sectional observational study.

Richa Khanna, Afroz Alam Ansari, Vijay Kumar Shakya, Simran Shivhare et al.
PubMed
Dental materials and restorations
article

A comparison of different clinical diagnostic criteria for adhesive restorations in children aged 5 to 10 years: a cross-sectional observational study.

Richa Khanna, Afroz Alam Ansari, Vijay Kumar Shakya, Simran Shivhare, Rajeev Kumar Singh
article en

Abstract

The results of the present study demonstrated an increased shift of treatment decisions towards aggressive interventions (repair/replacement) for restored tooth surfaces/restored primary/permanent teeth as per modified USPHS criteria, with fewer interventions indicated using FDI, followed by the CARS criteria. Future pediatric restorative protocols should incorporate standardized training modules for practitioners and researchers to interpret criteria uniformly.

PubMedVol. 57(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.