Name your enemy: Lysias the metic vs the social network of power

ABSTRACT The speech Against Eratosthenes was composed for a private case in which Lysias sought retribution for the killing of his brother Polemarchus at the hands of the Thirty. Eratosthenes, Lysias’ target, belonged to the moderate faction of the regime at the time of the events, but was one of the two surviving members who had remained in Athens, where he was not particularly unpopular. Lysias thus needed to portray the Thirty as a close-knit, corporative group whose members were all to be held responsible and liable for collective crimes. In this connection, a striking feature of this speech is the high number and frequency of personal names. The high density of prosoponyms contributes to painting a vivid picture of the events and their context. In particular, the large cast of villains portrays the oligarchs as an extended but well-defined social network, cornering Lysias into a position of isolation. Theramenes, their mastermind, is in turn portrayed as a well-connected but ultimately solitary villain—the mirror image of the persecuted metic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bics/qbaf035
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Name your enemy: Lysias the metic vs the social network of power

Alessandro Vatri
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Name your enemy: Lysias the metic vs the social network of power

Alessandro Vatri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The speech Against Eratosthenes was composed for a private case in which Lysias sought retribution for the killing of his brother Polemarchus at the hands of the Thirty. Eratosthenes, Lysias’ target, belonged to the moderate faction of the regime at the time of the events, but was one of the two surviving members who had remained in Athens, where he was not particularly unpopular. Lysias thus needed to portray the Thirty as a close-knit, corporative group whose members were all to be held responsible and liable for collective crimes. In this connection, a striking feature of this speech is the high number and frequency of personal names. The high density of prosoponyms contributes to painting a vivid picture of the events and their context. In particular, the large cast of villains portrays the oligarchs as an extended but well-defined social network, cornering Lysias into a position of isolation. Theramenes, their mastermind, is in turn portrayed as a well-connected but ultimately solitary villain—the mirror image of the persecuted metic.

Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Durham University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.