Track and Trace as Distinct Functional Layers in Traceability Systems

This manuscript presents a conceptual framework that clarifies the functional foundations of food traceability by explicitly distinguishing between tracking and tracing as two complementary but distinct layers. While traceability is widely mandated in food systems, persistent failures during audits and recall events suggest unresolved conceptual ambiguities in how traceability is operationalized. The paper proposes a minimal operational perspective in which tracking is defined as the structured recording of real operational events affecting fractions of food product lots, whereas tracing is defined as the reconstructive capability that relies exclusively on previously recorded tracking information. By introducing the concepts of lot fractions and reinterpreting the Bill of Materials (BOM) as a transformation ontology, the framework explains common traceability failure modes observed in food safety audits and partial recalls. The contribution is theoretical and system-oriented, deliberately excluding implementation-specific or technological solutions. The proposed framework is intended to support the evaluation, auditability, and design of food traceability systems across heterogeneous organizational contexts and production scales.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18322754
Primary Topic
Food Supply Chain Traceability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Track and Trace as Distinct Functional Layers in Traceability Systems

Heeber Garcia Lachica
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Food Supply Chain Traceability
article

Track and Trace as Distinct Functional Layers in Traceability Systems

Heeber Garcia Lachica
article en

Abstract

This manuscript presents a conceptual framework that clarifies the functional foundations of food traceability by explicitly distinguishing between tracking and tracing as two complementary but distinct layers. While traceability is widely mandated in food systems, persistent failures during audits and recall events suggest unresolved conceptual ambiguities in how traceability is operationalized. The paper proposes a minimal operational perspective in which tracking is defined as the structured recording of real operational events affecting fractions of food product lots, whereas tracing is defined as the reconstructive capability that relies exclusively on previously recorded tracking information. By introducing the concepts of lot fractions and reinterpreting the Bill of Materials (BOM) as a transformation ontology, the framework explains common traceability failure modes observed in food safety audits and partial recalls. The contribution is theoretical and system-oriented, deliberately excluding implementation-specific or technological solutions. The proposed framework is intended to support the evaluation, auditability, and design of food traceability systems across heterogeneous organizational contexts and production scales.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Food Supply Chain Traceability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.