Inspecting the Retina: Oculomotor Patterns and Accuracy in Fundus Image Interpretation by Novice Versus Experienced Eye Care Practitioners

Visual search behavior, influenced by expertise, prior knowledge, training, and visual fatigue, is crucial in ophthalmic diagnostics. This study investigates differences in eye-tracking strategies between novice and experienced eye care practitioners during fundus image interpretation. Forty-seven participants, including 37 novices (first- to fourth-year optometry students) and 10 experienced optometrists (≥2 years of experience), viewed 20 fundus images (10 normal, 10 abnormal) while their eye movements were recorded using an Eyelink1000 Plus gaze tracker (2000 Hz). Diagnostic and laterality accuracy were assessed, and statistical analyses were conducted using Sigma Plot 12.0. Results showed that experienced practitioners had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (83 ± 6.3%) than novices (70 ± 12.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.005). Significant differences in oculomotor behavior were observed, including median latency (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while no significant differences were found in median peak velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.11) or laterality accuracy (<i>p</i> = 0.97). Diagnostic accuracy correlated with fixation count in novices (r = 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while laterality accuracy correlated with total dwelling time (r = -0.62, <i>p</i> < 0.005). The experienced practitioners demonstrated systematic and focused visual search patterns, whereas the novices exhibited unorganized scan paths. Enhancing training with visual feedback could improve fundus image analysis accuracy in novice clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19010011
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inspecting the Retina: Oculomotor Patterns and Accuracy in Fundus Image Interpretation by Novice Versus Experienced Eye Care Practitioners

Suraj Upadhyaya
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
article

Inspecting the Retina: Oculomotor Patterns and Accuracy in Fundus Image Interpretation by Novice Versus Experienced Eye Care Practitioners

Suraj Upadhyaya
article en

Abstract

Visual search behavior, influenced by expertise, prior knowledge, training, and visual fatigue, is crucial in ophthalmic diagnostics. This study investigates differences in eye-tracking strategies between novice and experienced eye care practitioners during fundus image interpretation. Forty-seven participants, including 37 novices (first- to fourth-year optometry students) and 10 experienced optometrists (≥2 years of experience), viewed 20 fundus images (10 normal, 10 abnormal) while their eye movements were recorded using an Eyelink1000 Plus gaze tracker (2000 Hz). Diagnostic and laterality accuracy were assessed, and statistical analyses were conducted using Sigma Plot 12.0. Results showed that experienced practitioners had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (83 ± 6.3%) than novices (70 ± 12.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.005). Significant differences in oculomotor behavior were observed, including median latency (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while no significant differences were found in median peak velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.11) or laterality accuracy (<i>p</i> = 0.97). Diagnostic accuracy correlated with fixation count in novices (r = 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while laterality accuracy correlated with total dwelling time (r = -0.62, <i>p</i> < 0.005). The experienced practitioners demonstrated systematic and focused visual search patterns, whereas the novices exhibited unorganized scan paths. Enhancing training with visual feedback could improve fundus image analysis accuracy in novice clinicians.

Journal of Eye Movement ResearchVol. 19(1)
Midwestern University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.