Othering the state: invoking power in Cuba and beyond

Anthropologists have documented the tendency of certain populations to conceptualize state authorities as an Other, a ‘they’, distinct from ‘us’, the struggling majority. This study examines contemporary Cuba to shed light on this phenomenon. Based on fieldwork among market traders in Havana, I analyse the inclination to characterize state power as an ominous ‘they’ as a response to a form of statecraft that presents itself as homogeneous and insurmountable yet remains unaccountable to ordinary people, within a worsening political economy. By using the third‐person plural to comment on the state system's illegitimacies and failures, Cubans performatively distance themselves from official rule. These linguistic habits underscore the importance of moving beyond the analytical approach of deconstructing binaries of ‘us’ and ‘them’, ‘state’ and ‘people’, and rather explore how citizens use them as semiotic resources to invoke and critique power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.70028
Primary Topic
Cuban History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Othering the state: invoking power in Cuba and beyond

Ståle Wig
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Cuban History and Society
article

Othering the state: invoking power in Cuba and beyond

Ståle Wig
article en

Abstract

Anthropologists have documented the tendency of certain populations to conceptualize state authorities as an Other, a ‘they’, distinct from ‘us’, the struggling majority. This study examines contemporary Cuba to shed light on this phenomenon. Based on fieldwork among market traders in Havana, I analyse the inclination to characterize state power as an ominous ‘they’ as a response to a form of statecraft that presents itself as homogeneous and insurmountable yet remains unaccountable to ordinary people, within a worsening political economy. By using the third‐person plural to comment on the state system's illegitimacies and failures, Cubans performatively distance themselves from official rule. These linguistic habits underscore the importance of moving beyond the analytical approach of deconstructing binaries of ‘us’ and ‘them’, ‘state’ and ‘people’, and rather explore how citizens use them as semiotic resources to invoke and critique power.

Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
University of Oslo (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Cuban History and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.