Ethical governance implementation in MENA countries: institutional frameworks, cultural dynamics, and performance outcomes in the post-2021 era

Purpose This study explores how ethical governance frameworks operate in environmental, social and governance (ESG) areas in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) nations. This study focusses on present systems, cultural changes and outcomes since 2021. This study examines how traditional governance aligns with modern ethical values to promote accountability in the region. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a mixed-methods research design, combining quantitative analysis of governance data from eight MENA countries (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco and Oman) with a qualitative institutional framework assessment. The study used data from the World Bank Governance Indicators, Transparency International Corruption Perception Index and Refinitiv ESG scores for 2022–2024. It analysed 248 randomly selected companies. Findings The findings show that Ethical governance varies significantly across countries. Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have stronger frameworks, but struggle with transparency. Research limitations/implications This study shows some temporal limits. It covers data from 2022 to 2024 and focusses on eight countries. The numbers may not precisely outline informal governance procedures in MENA nations. There are also challenges with data reliability because the corruption records cover 2023–2024, while other governance indicators cover 2022–2024. Practical implications This study shows that traditional cultural values can enhance modern governance rather than hinder it. It highlights inclusive governance methods that maintain cultural authenticity while meeting international expectations, supporting sustainable economic development in the MENA region. Originality/value This study presents the first comprehensive post-2021 comparative analysis of the implementation of ethical governance across diverse MENA institutional environments. This study develops a novel framework, “Cultural-Institutional Complementarity”, that explains how Islamic ethical principles enhance the effectiveness of governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-08-2025-0137
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical governance implementation in MENA countries: institutional frameworks, cultural dynamics, and performance outcomes in the post-2021 era

Aloma Jayasundera, Rubhesh Jha
Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Ethical governance implementation in MENA countries: institutional frameworks, cultural dynamics, and performance outcomes in the post-2021 era

Aloma Jayasundera, Rubhesh Jha
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study explores how ethical governance frameworks operate in environmental, social and governance (ESG) areas in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) nations. This study focusses on present systems, cultural changes and outcomes since 2021. This study examines how traditional governance aligns with modern ethical values to promote accountability in the region. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a mixed-methods research design, combining quantitative analysis of governance data from eight MENA countries (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco and Oman) with a qualitative institutional framework assessment. The study used data from the World Bank Governance Indicators, Transparency International Corruption Perception Index and Refinitiv ESG scores for 2022–2024. It analysed 248 randomly selected companies. Findings The findings show that Ethical governance varies significantly across countries. Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have stronger frameworks, but struggle with transparency. Research limitations/implications This study shows some temporal limits. It covers data from 2022 to 2024 and focusses on eight countries. The numbers may not precisely outline informal governance procedures in MENA nations. There are also challenges with data reliability because the corruption records cover 2023–2024, while other governance indicators cover 2022–2024. Practical implications This study shows that traditional cultural values can enhance modern governance rather than hinder it. It highlights inclusive governance methods that maintain cultural authenticity while meeting international expectations, supporting sustainable economic development in the MENA region. Originality/value This study presents the first comprehensive post-2021 comparative analysis of the implementation of ethical governance across diverse MENA institutional environments. This study develops a novel framework, “Cultural-Institutional Complementarity”, that explains how Islamic ethical principles enhance the effectiveness of governance.

Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences
Climate Central (US), University of Liverpool (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.