The differences in sex ratio between sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is more prevalent in males than in females. However, it is unclear whether the difference in sex ratio is observed similarly in sporadic compared to familial ALS. Here, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the differences in sex ratio between familial and sporadic ALS. Following the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines, this study searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate sex ratios in a total of 9269 ALS patients (4135 female, 5134 male) across 20 included studies. We confirmed that ALS is more prevalent in males than in females (sex ratio: 1.25 (95%CI 1.14-1.37). However, when we stratified the analyses, the sex ratio was only different in sporadic ALS. Male-to-female ratios were 1.29 (95% CI 1.16-1.42) for sporadic ALS and 1.05 (95% CI 0.93-1.18) for familial ALS. A further analysis showed a pooled risk ratio of 1.07 (95% CI 1.00-1.15), indicating a 7% higher likelihood of males being diagnosed with sporadic rather than familial ALS. These findings highlight the importance of considering sex-specific factors in ALS research and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurology
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-13627-1
Primary Topic
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The differences in sex ratio between sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review

Aafke Boomsma, Sang Lee, Beben Benyamin, Mary-Louise Rogers et al.
Journal of Neurology
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
article

The differences in sex ratio between sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review

Aafke Boomsma, Sang Lee, Beben Benyamin, Mary-Louise Rogers, Na Sai, Caitlin Doyle
article en

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is more prevalent in males than in females. However, it is unclear whether the difference in sex ratio is observed similarly in sporadic compared to familial ALS. Here, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the differences in sex ratio between familial and sporadic ALS. Following the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines, this study searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate sex ratios in a total of 9269 ALS patients (4135 female, 5134 male) across 20 included studies. We confirmed that ALS is more prevalent in males than in females (sex ratio: 1.25 (95%CI 1.14-1.37). However, when we stratified the analyses, the sex ratio was only different in sporadic ALS. Male-to-female ratios were 1.29 (95% CI 1.16-1.42) for sporadic ALS and 1.05 (95% CI 0.93-1.18) for familial ALS. A further analysis showed a pooled risk ratio of 1.07 (95% CI 1.00-1.15), indicating a 7% higher likelihood of males being diagnosed with sporadic rather than familial ALS. These findings highlight the importance of considering sex-specific factors in ALS research and clinical practice.

Journal of NeurologyVol. 273(2)
Flinders University (AU), University of South Australia (AU), SA Health (AU), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU), Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.