Temporal Arcuate Relaxing Retinotomy for Persistent Full-Thickness Macular Holes: Anatomical and Functional Assessment

<b>Background:</b> Evidence guiding secondary repair of persistent full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) remains limited and heterogeneous. Temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy has been described as a salvage maneuver intended to increase temporal retinal compliance, yet functional safety data are scarce. We report consecutive real-world outcomes of temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy for persistent FTMHs after failed standard repair(s). <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective consecutive case series of patients with persistent FTMH after ≥1 pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, treated with repeat PPV and temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy. Outcomes included OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography)-confirmed closure after gas absorption and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), ellipsoid zone (EZ) status, retinotomy-site morphology on OCT/fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and safety/functional outcomes (systematic scotoma symptom inquiry; Humphrey visual field testing when feasible). Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for proportions. <b>Results:</b> Nine eyes (median age 70 years; range 55-76) underwent temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy for persistent FTMH. Minimum linear diameter ranged 412-1037 µm (median 613 µm). OCT-confirmed closure was achieved in 7/9 eyes (77.8%; 95% CI 40.0-97.2) at a mean follow-up of 5.9 months (range 2-12). BCVA improved in 8/9 eyes (88.9%; 95% CI 51.8-99.7); mean BCVA improved from 1.26 ± 0.51 logMAR pre-operatively to 0.61 ± 0.18 logMAR at last follow-up (mean change -0.64 logMAR; Wilcoxon signed-rank test <i>p</i> = 0.011). As a sensitivity analysis, the paired <i>t</i>-test yielded <i>p</i> = 0.008. Humphrey visual fields were obtained in 6/9 eyes; one patient reported a new paracentral nasal scotoma, which was subjectively well tolerated. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this small consecutive series, temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy was associated with a 78% closure rate and mean BCVA improvement in eyes with persistent FTMH after failed standard repair(s), with limited symptomatic scotoma reporting in those assessed. Given the retrospective design, small cohort, and incomplete standardized functional testing, larger comparative studies with uniform functional endpoints (microperimetry, RNFL/GCL metrics, and systematic perimetry) are needed to define patient selection, reproducibility, and relative performance versus contemporary salvage options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020863
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal Arcuate Relaxing Retinotomy for Persistent Full-Thickness Macular Holes: Anatomical and Functional Assessment

Gabriella De Salvo, Michele Reibaldi, Antonio Valastro, Erik Mus et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

Temporal Arcuate Relaxing Retinotomy for Persistent Full-Thickness Macular Holes: Anatomical and Functional Assessment

Gabriella De Salvo, Michele Reibaldi, Antonio Valastro, Erik Mus, Luca Ventre
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Evidence guiding secondary repair of persistent full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) remains limited and heterogeneous. Temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy has been described as a salvage maneuver intended to increase temporal retinal compliance, yet functional safety data are scarce. We report consecutive real-world outcomes of temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy for persistent FTMHs after failed standard repair(s). <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective consecutive case series of patients with persistent FTMH after ≥1 pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, treated with repeat PPV and temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy. Outcomes included OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography)-confirmed closure after gas absorption and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), ellipsoid zone (EZ) status, retinotomy-site morphology on OCT/fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and safety/functional outcomes (systematic scotoma symptom inquiry; Humphrey visual field testing when feasible). Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for proportions. <b>Results:</b> Nine eyes (median age 70 years; range 55-76) underwent temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy for persistent FTMH. Minimum linear diameter ranged 412-1037 µm (median 613 µm). OCT-confirmed closure was achieved in 7/9 eyes (77.8%; 95% CI 40.0-97.2) at a mean follow-up of 5.9 months (range 2-12). BCVA improved in 8/9 eyes (88.9%; 95% CI 51.8-99.7); mean BCVA improved from 1.26 ± 0.51 logMAR pre-operatively to 0.61 ± 0.18 logMAR at last follow-up (mean change -0.64 logMAR; Wilcoxon signed-rank test <i>p</i> = 0.011). As a sensitivity analysis, the paired <i>t</i>-test yielded <i>p</i> = 0.008. Humphrey visual fields were obtained in 6/9 eyes; one patient reported a new paracentral nasal scotoma, which was subjectively well tolerated. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this small consecutive series, temporal arcuate relaxing retinotomy was associated with a 78% closure rate and mean BCVA improvement in eyes with persistent FTMH after failed standard repair(s), with limited symptomatic scotoma reporting in those assessed. Given the retrospective design, small cohort, and incomplete standardized functional testing, larger comparative studies with uniform functional endpoints (microperimetry, RNFL/GCL metrics, and systematic perimetry) are needed to define patient selection, reproducibility, and relative performance versus contemporary salvage options.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Azienda USL della Valle d’Aosta (IT), University of Southampton (GB), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.