Students’ concept image of 0!

Abstract This study investigates students’ concept image of $$0!$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> among 12th- and 13th-grade students as well as second-semester university students by asking them to explain the value of $$0!$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The analysis of the responses revealed two different categories of explanations: mathematical explanations based on the empty product or on reasons of consistency and the supposed application of the factorial formula, as well as explanations based on the characteristics of 0. The latter type—mainly using multiplication and exponentiation—were predominant among school and university students. In line with the theoretical emphasis on the epistemic role of definitions, this study highlights that definitions serve not only to ensure mathematical consistency but can also acquire specific meanings that foster the application of mathematical concepts. Developing a suitable concept image of $$0!$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , aligned with its concept definition, is essential already at school in order to support correct application in combinatorics and probability theory. Overall, the study shows that both school and university students experience difficulties providing an adequate explanation for $$0!=1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . This can lead to further complications if the value of $$0!$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is not discussed in class. For example, students cannot make the connection between the two formulas for arrangement and permutation, perceiving $$0!=1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> as an arbitrary determination that seems counterintuitive at first glance. In contrast, when students are familiar with the underlying reasoning, they can develop a deeper conceptual understanding rather than relying solely on a mechanical application of the rules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10454-5
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ concept image of 0!

Karina Höveler, Birte Pöhler, Charlott Thomas
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Students’ concept image of 0!

Karina Höveler, Birte Pöhler, Charlott Thomas
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates students’ concept image of $$0!$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> among 12th- and 13th-grade students as well as second-semester university students by asking them to explain the value of $$0!$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The analysis of the responses revealed two different categories of explanations: mathematical explanations based on the empty product or on reasons of consistency and the supposed application of the factorial formula, as well as explanations based on the characteristics of 0. The latter type—mainly using multiplication and exponentiation—were predominant among school and university students. In line with the theoretical emphasis on the epistemic role of definitions, this study highlights that definitions serve not only to ensure mathematical consistency but can also acquire specific meanings that foster the application of mathematical concepts. Developing a suitable concept image of $$0!$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , aligned with its concept definition, is essential already at school in order to support correct application in combinatorics and probability theory. Overall, the study shows that both school and university students experience difficulties providing an adequate explanation for $$0!=1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . This can lead to further complications if the value of $$0!$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is not discussed in class. For example, students cannot make the connection between the two formulas for arrangement and permutation, perceiving $$0!=1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>!</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> as an arbitrary determination that seems counterintuitive at first glance. In contrast, when students are familiar with the underlying reasoning, they can develop a deeper conceptual understanding rather than relying solely on a mechanical application of the rules.

Educational Studies in MathematicsVol. 121(2)
University of Potsdam (DE), University of Applied Sciences Potsdam (DE), Augenstern (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.