Machine learning downscaling of GRACE satellite data for local-scale water storage assessment in South-East Queensland, Australia

Monitoring terrestrial water storage (TWS) at local scales remains challenging due to the coarse spatial resolution of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data. Although machine learning (ML)-based downscaling techniques offer a pathway to improve resolution, their reliability in capturing localised hydrological variability requires further evaluation. The main aim of this study is to evaluate five ML models - Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Generalised Additive Model (GAM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) - to downscale GRACE-derived TWS anomalies from 1.0°×1.0° to 0.05°×0.05° across South-East Queensland, Australia, for the 2002–2022 period. High-resolution predictors of precipitation, evapotranspiration, and runoff from the Australian Water Outlook platform were used as inputs into the ML models. The downscaled outputs were validated using in-situ observations from 43 precipitation gauges, 98 groundwater monitoring wells, and 42 surface water level stations distributed across the study region. Among all the models, GPR consistently achieved the best performance (MAE = 1.4 mm, RMSE = 2.5 mm), followed in performance by RF (MAE = 4.6 mm, RMSE = 7.2 mm), GAM (MAE = 5.1 mm, RMSE = 8.1 mm), ANN, and SVM, respectively. Correlation coefficients between in situ groundwater levels (GWL) and downscaled outputs ranged from 0.77 to 0.79, while for surface water levels (SWL) they varied from 0.47 to 0.48, with RF, GPR and GAM providing the best fit for GWL estimates. This study provides an opportunity to enhance the use of GRACE in regional hydrological assessments where dense monitoring networks are absent or limited. • Evaluated five machine learning models to downscale GRACE TWS at catchment scale. • GPR emerges as the strongest single model across evaluation targets. • Random Forest and GAM show high accuracy and stable groundwater representation. • Downscaled TWS preserves GRACE mass signals with minimal error and high fidelity. • Enhanced TWS supports drought detection and water-resource planning in SEQ.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GEOMATICA
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomat.2026.100094
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning downscaling of GRACE satellite data for local-scale water storage assessment in South-East Queensland, Australia

Oluwafemi E. Adeyeri, Manpreet Chahal, Ikechukwu Kalu, Fernanda Helfer et al.
GEOMATICA
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Machine learning downscaling of GRACE satellite data for local-scale water storage assessment in South-East Queensland, Australia

Oluwafemi E. Adeyeri, Manpreet Chahal, Ikechukwu Kalu, Fernanda Helfer, Sayantan Majumdar, Christopher Ndehedehe
article en

Abstract

Monitoring terrestrial water storage (TWS) at local scales remains challenging due to the coarse spatial resolution of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data. Although machine learning (ML)-based downscaling techniques offer a pathway to improve resolution, their reliability in capturing localised hydrological variability requires further evaluation. The main aim of this study is to evaluate five ML models - Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Generalised Additive Model (GAM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) - to downscale GRACE-derived TWS anomalies from 1.0°×1.0° to 0.05°×0.05° across South-East Queensland, Australia, for the 2002–2022 period. High-resolution predictors of precipitation, evapotranspiration, and runoff from the Australian Water Outlook platform were used as inputs into the ML models. The downscaled outputs were validated using in-situ observations from 43 precipitation gauges, 98 groundwater monitoring wells, and 42 surface water level stations distributed across the study region. Among all the models, GPR consistently achieved the best performance (MAE = 1.4 mm, RMSE = 2.5 mm), followed in performance by RF (MAE = 4.6 mm, RMSE = 7.2 mm), GAM (MAE = 5.1 mm, RMSE = 8.1 mm), ANN, and SVM, respectively. Correlation coefficients between in situ groundwater levels (GWL) and downscaled outputs ranged from 0.77 to 0.79, while for surface water levels (SWL) they varied from 0.47 to 0.48, with RF, GPR and GAM providing the best fit for GWL estimates. This study provides an opportunity to enhance the use of GRACE in regional hydrological assessments where dense monitoring networks are absent or limited. • Evaluated five machine learning models to downscale GRACE TWS at catchment scale. • GPR emerges as the strongest single model across evaluation targets. • Random Forest and GAM show high accuracy and stable groundwater representation. • Downscaled TWS preserves GRACE mass signals with minimal error and high fidelity. • Enhanced TWS supports drought detection and water-resource planning in SEQ.

GEOMATICAVol. 78(1)
Griffith University (AU), Australian National University (AU), Desert Research Institute (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.