On robotic enactments of older and younger people: functions, futures, imaginaries

Abstract In this paper, we explore some of the assumptions about human users that underpin the promotion of robotics. In particular, we compare representations of younger and older persons that are tacitly enacted in websites devoted to promoting the use of social robots. The comparison serves to throw into relief the respective assumptions about these two user groups and to illuminate the variety of discourses, representations and imaginaries that resource those assumptions. Using snowballing techniques, we examine a sample of websites devoted to promoting social robots or to presenting consumer reviews of respective strengths and weaknesses of different social robots for particular age groups. Drawing on Science and Technology Studies, we subject these data to a thematic analysis in order to critically illuminate: the assumed futures in which these robots will function; the model of older and younger generations and their ostensible needs; and the broader imaginaries of society and economy which inform the interactions between robots and people. We note that these promotional accounts tend to present both highly specific and rather vague articulations of the future; stereotype older and younger people and oversimplify their needs; and deploy imaginaries in which a limited version of the economy predominates. We conclude with some thoughts on how the ethos of robotic design might be adapted to address more complex inter-generational relations and social and material conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02828-3
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On robotic enactments of older and younger people: functions, futures, imaginaries

Mike Michael, Miquel Domènech
AI & Society
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

On robotic enactments of older and younger people: functions, futures, imaginaries

Mike Michael, Miquel Domènech
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we explore some of the assumptions about human users that underpin the promotion of robotics. In particular, we compare representations of younger and older persons that are tacitly enacted in websites devoted to promoting the use of social robots. The comparison serves to throw into relief the respective assumptions about these two user groups and to illuminate the variety of discourses, representations and imaginaries that resource those assumptions. Using snowballing techniques, we examine a sample of websites devoted to promoting social robots or to presenting consumer reviews of respective strengths and weaknesses of different social robots for particular age groups. Drawing on Science and Technology Studies, we subject these data to a thematic analysis in order to critically illuminate: the assumed futures in which these robots will function; the model of older and younger generations and their ostensible needs; and the broader imaginaries of society and economy which inform the interactions between robots and people. We note that these promotional accounts tend to present both highly specific and rather vague articulations of the future; stereotype older and younger people and oversimplify their needs; and deploy imaginaries in which a limited version of the economy predominates. We conclude with some thoughts on how the ethos of robotic design might be adapted to address more complex inter-generational relations and social and material conditions.

AI & Society
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.