Evaluation of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Equations Against Air-Displacement Plethysmography in an Eastern European Population

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used and an easy-to-apply method for determining body composition. However, its accuracy depends on population-specific equations. The aim of the present study is to identify the most appropriate fat-free mass (FFM) prediction equation for an Eastern European population using air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the reference method. The study group included 101 Caucasian subjects (56 women and 45 men) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 25.37 ± 5.45 kg/m2. One set of FFMBIA values was automatically calculated with the analyzer (Maltron BioScan 920-2), and four others were computed using the published equations of Kyle, Kanellakis, Heitman, and Deurenberg. The results were compared to FFMADP values measured using a BOD POD Gold Standard Body Composition Tracking System by Bland–Altman analysis. The smallest bias was obtained with the equation by Deurenberg, which underestimated FFM by only −0.22 ± 4.52 kg. The largest bias was obtained with the equation by Kyle (5.92 ± 4.73 kg), followed by the formula of Kanellakis (3.04 ± 4.65 kg). The equations by Heitman and the Maltron inbuilt formula overestimated FFM by 2.15 ± 4.27 kg and, respectively, 1.95 ± 4.3 kg. Although Maltron’s automatically generated values were very strongly correlated with ADP results (CCC = 0.93, SEE = 4.7), the formula by Deurenberg provided the most reliable estimates in the studied population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021082
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Equations Against Air-Displacement Plethysmography in an Eastern European Population

Iuliana Creţescu, Raluca Horhat, Oana Munteanu, Valeria Mocanu
Applied Sciences
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
article

Evaluation of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Equations Against Air-Displacement Plethysmography in an Eastern European Population

Iuliana Creţescu, Raluca Horhat, Oana Munteanu, Valeria Mocanu
article en

Abstract

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used and an easy-to-apply method for determining body composition. However, its accuracy depends on population-specific equations. The aim of the present study is to identify the most appropriate fat-free mass (FFM) prediction equation for an Eastern European population using air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the reference method. The study group included 101 Caucasian subjects (56 women and 45 men) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 25.37 ± 5.45 kg/m2. One set of FFMBIA values was automatically calculated with the analyzer (Maltron BioScan 920-2), and four others were computed using the published equations of Kyle, Kanellakis, Heitman, and Deurenberg. The results were compared to FFMADP values measured using a BOD POD Gold Standard Body Composition Tracking System by Bland–Altman analysis. The smallest bias was obtained with the equation by Deurenberg, which underestimated FFM by only −0.22 ± 4.52 kg. The largest bias was obtained with the equation by Kyle (5.92 ± 4.73 kg), followed by the formula of Kanellakis (3.04 ± 4.65 kg). The equations by Heitman and the Maltron inbuilt formula overestimated FFM by 2.15 ± 4.27 kg and, respectively, 1.95 ± 4.3 kg. Although Maltron’s automatically generated values were very strongly correlated with ADP results (CCC = 0.93, SEE = 4.7), the formula by Deurenberg provided the most reliable estimates in the studied population.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(2)
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.