Delayed Duodenal Ulcer Perforation Following Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Complicated by Perforation: A Case Report

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established treatment of superficial esophageal neoplasms. Common complications include bleeding, perforation, and stricture. However, delayed gastrointestinal perforation distant from the ESD site is exceptionally rare. We report the case of a woman in her 70s with a history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated duodenal ulcer and <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection who underwent ESD for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. After eradication therapy and 2 months of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, both treatments were discontinued. Preoperative endoscopy confirmed a scarred duodenal ulcer. Intraoperative esophageal perforation occurred during ESD and was closed with clips. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) showed mediastinal emphysema without intra-abdominal free air. The patient was treated in high care with fasting and antibiotics, but without PPI therapy. Six days postoperatively, the patient developed acute abdominal pain. CT revealed free air near the duodenal bulb, and emergency endoscopy identified a 10-mm perforated duodenal ulcer at the scarred site. Endoscopic closure was unfeasible, and laparoscopic omental patch repair was performed. PPI therapy was resumed postoperatively, and the patient recovered uneventfully. This case suggests that stress-related mucosal disease may have contributed to duodenal perforation. Background risks included ulcer history and scarring, whereas alleviating factors included no NSAID/steroid exposure, eradicated <i>H. pylori</i>, and absence of infection at the esophageal perforation. Guidelines do not endorse routine PPI use after ESD, and consensus following iatrogenic perforation is lacking. This case suggests that prophylactic PPI therapy may be considered in patients with risk factors such as recent peptic ulcer disease or intraoperative perforation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DEN Open
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70269
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delayed Duodenal Ulcer Perforation Following Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Complicated by Perforation: A Case Report

Kazuya Inoki, Masayuki Tojo, Yoshinao Onishi, Takahiro Fuji et al.
DEN Open
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Delayed Duodenal Ulcer Perforation Following Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Complicated by Perforation: A Case Report

Kazuya Inoki, Masayuki Tojo, Yoshinao Onishi, Takahiro Fuji, Atsushi Katagiri, Takeshi Aoki, Sayaka Mizuno, Hitoshi Yoshida, Shinya Nakatani
article en

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established treatment of superficial esophageal neoplasms. Common complications include bleeding, perforation, and stricture. However, delayed gastrointestinal perforation distant from the ESD site is exceptionally rare. We report the case of a woman in her 70s with a history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated duodenal ulcer and <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection who underwent ESD for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. After eradication therapy and 2 months of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, both treatments were discontinued. Preoperative endoscopy confirmed a scarred duodenal ulcer. Intraoperative esophageal perforation occurred during ESD and was closed with clips. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) showed mediastinal emphysema without intra-abdominal free air. The patient was treated in high care with fasting and antibiotics, but without PPI therapy. Six days postoperatively, the patient developed acute abdominal pain. CT revealed free air near the duodenal bulb, and emergency endoscopy identified a 10-mm perforated duodenal ulcer at the scarred site. Endoscopic closure was unfeasible, and laparoscopic omental patch repair was performed. PPI therapy was resumed postoperatively, and the patient recovered uneventfully. This case suggests that stress-related mucosal disease may have contributed to duodenal perforation. Background risks included ulcer history and scarring, whereas alleviating factors included no NSAID/steroid exposure, eradicated <i>H. pylori</i>, and absence of infection at the esophageal perforation. Guidelines do not endorse routine PPI use after ESD, and consensus following iatrogenic perforation is lacking. This case suggests that prophylactic PPI therapy may be considered in patients with risk factors such as recent peptic ulcer disease or intraoperative perforation.

DEN OpenVol. 6(1)
SHOWA Medical University (JP), SHOWA Medical University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.