Federal Grants, Racialized Eligibility, and Ideological Control: The New (E)Quality Politics of Higher Education

Never before has the role of the federal government in underwriting U.S. higher education been more visible than in the early months of the second Trump Administration. The Administration’s aggressive anti-DEI and anti-science attacks have exposed the reliance within higher education, especially among research institutions, on federal grantmaking infrastructure. In this paper, we use the (e)quality politics framework to analyze the Trump Administration’s attack on federal grantmaking infrastructure as well as the response and/or resistance from targeted institutions and concerned advocates. Bringing this theoretical model into conversation with present-day empirics allows us to not only parse the underlying, racialized ideology of these political moves but to surface political and practical insights for organized resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010163
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Federal Grants, Racialized Eligibility, and Ideological Control: The New (E)Quality Politics of Higher Education

Claudia Zapata-Gietl, Crystal Couch, Heather McCambly
Education Sciences
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Federal Grants, Racialized Eligibility, and Ideological Control: The New (E)Quality Politics of Higher Education

Claudia Zapata-Gietl, Crystal Couch, Heather McCambly
article en

Abstract

Never before has the role of the federal government in underwriting U.S. higher education been more visible than in the early months of the second Trump Administration. The Administration’s aggressive anti-DEI and anti-science attacks have exposed the reliance within higher education, especially among research institutions, on federal grantmaking infrastructure. In this paper, we use the (e)quality politics framework to analyze the Trump Administration’s attack on federal grantmaking infrastructure as well as the response and/or resistance from targeted institutions and concerned advocates. Bringing this theoretical model into conversation with present-day empirics allows us to not only parse the underlying, racialized ideology of these political moves but to surface political and practical insights for organized resistance.

Education SciencesVol. 16(1)
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.