Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Posterior Fossa Abnormality Recognition on First-Trimester US Screening Scans: AIRFRAME Study Part 1

Purpose To develop a deep learning algorithm to automatically assess the posterior fossa on first-trimester US screening scans and identify open spina bifida (OSB) and cystic posterior fossa (CPF) anomalies. Materials and Methods This was the retrospective part of an international study involving 10 fetal medicine centers. Normal and abnormal (OSB, CPF anomaly) midsagittal fetal brain US images acquired between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation (July 2009-January 2024) with confirmed diagnosis at follow-up were evaluated. Images were manually annotated to delineate the posterior fossa. The dataset was split into a training/validation set (70%) and internal test set (30%). Three convolutional neural networks were trained via threefold cross-validation on the training/validation set, with predictions on the internal test set obtained by ensemble averaging across folds. Model performance in detecting OSB and CPF anomalies was evaluated for the whole cohort and for fetuses with OSB or CPF anomalies separately. Results Images from 251 fetuses were analyzed (mean gestational age [±SD], 12.7 weeks ± 0.65; 150 normal and 101 abnormal [43 OSB and 58 CPF anomalies] images). On the internal test, the MobileNetV3 Large Weights achieved the best performance: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.99); accuracy, 88% (67 of 76); recall, 81% (25 of 31); specificity, 93% (42 of 45); precision, 89% (25 of 28); negative predictive value, 88% (42 of 48); and F1 score, 0.85. OSB was classified more accurately (93% [52 of 56] vs 88% [57 of 65]; <i>P</i> = .38) and with higher recall (91% [10 of 11] vs 75% [15 of 20]), although the difference was not significant (<i>P</i> = .38). Conclusion MobileNetV3 Large Weights accurately assessed the fetal posterior fossa between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation, distinguishing normal images from those showing OSB or CPF anomalies. Clinical trial registration no. NCT0579047 <b>Keywords:</b> Artificial Intelligence, First Trimester Ultrasound Screening, Fetal Brain Anomalies, Deep Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2026 See also commentary by Rafful in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250394
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Posterior Fossa Abnormality Recognition on First-Trimester US Screening Scans: AIRFRAME Study Part 1

Tiziana Fanelli, Veronica Falcone, E. Quarello, C. Scala et al.
1 citations
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
41.22
article

Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Posterior Fossa Abnormality Recognition on First-Trimester US Screening Scans: AIRFRAME Study Part 1

Tiziana Fanelli, Veronica Falcone, E. Quarello, C. Scala, M. Minopoli, Miss Marica Vagni, E. Corno, Ricciarda Raffaelli, Basky Thilaganathan, Carlotta Bizzarri, Jayshree Ramkrishna, C. Di Ilio, Alessandra Familiari, E. di Pasquo, Ruben Ramirez Zegarra, Luca Boldrini, Paolo Volpe, Federico Prefumo, Simon Meagher, Alessandra Bovino, Julia Binder, G. Grisolia, Andrea Dall’Asta, Tullio Ghi, Huong Elena Tran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose To develop a deep learning algorithm to automatically assess the posterior fossa on first-trimester US screening scans and identify open spina bifida (OSB) and cystic posterior fossa (CPF) anomalies. Materials and Methods This was the retrospective part of an international study involving 10 fetal medicine centers. Normal and abnormal (OSB, CPF anomaly) midsagittal fetal brain US images acquired between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation (July 2009-January 2024) with confirmed diagnosis at follow-up were evaluated. Images were manually annotated to delineate the posterior fossa. The dataset was split into a training/validation set (70%) and internal test set (30%). Three convolutional neural networks were trained via threefold cross-validation on the training/validation set, with predictions on the internal test set obtained by ensemble averaging across folds. Model performance in detecting OSB and CPF anomalies was evaluated for the whole cohort and for fetuses with OSB or CPF anomalies separately. Results Images from 251 fetuses were analyzed (mean gestational age [±SD], 12.7 weeks ± 0.65; 150 normal and 101 abnormal [43 OSB and 58 CPF anomalies] images). On the internal test, the MobileNetV3 Large Weights achieved the best performance: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.99); accuracy, 88% (67 of 76); recall, 81% (25 of 31); specificity, 93% (42 of 45); precision, 89% (25 of 28); negative predictive value, 88% (42 of 48); and F1 score, 0.85. OSB was classified more accurately (93% [52 of 56] vs 88% [57 of 65]; <i>P</i> = .38) and with higher recall (91% [10 of 11] vs 75% [15 of 20]), although the difference was not significant (<i>P</i> = .38). Conclusion MobileNetV3 Large Weights accurately assessed the fetal posterior fossa between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation, distinguishing normal images from those showing OSB or CPF anomalies. Clinical trial registration no. NCT0579047 <b>Keywords:</b> Artificial Intelligence, First Trimester Ultrasound Screening, Fetal Brain Anomalies, Deep Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2026 See also commentary by Rafful in this issue.

Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 8(2)
University of Verona (IT), University of Parma (IT), St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Hôpital Saint Joseph (FR), Délégation Provence et Corse (FR), Ospedale di Monfalcone (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma (IT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
41.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.