The Precarity of Disability Rights Historically and in the Trump Administration

The United States is experiencing an attack on disability rights unprecedented since the emergence of the modern Disability Rights Movement. This paper examines the various ways in which disability rights have been undercut in 2025. To do so, I provide a theoretical framework based in rights theory to reveal the precarity of disability rights and the strategy behind the actions taken by the Trump administration. I examine four key strategies to undercut disability rights: constructing disabled people as unworthy of the status of rights-bearer, constructing threats and conflicts across rights, dismantling the infrastructure of positive rights, and rejecting the value of disability rights across relational sites. Moreover, I argue that in part the effectiveness of contemporary attacks are deeply related to American history, because disability rights have always been contentious and left vulnerable to attack.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Societies
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010037
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Precarity of Disability Rights Historically and in the Trump Administration

Allison C. Carey
Societies
Disability Rights and Representation
article

The Precarity of Disability Rights Historically and in the Trump Administration

Allison C. Carey
article en

Abstract

The United States is experiencing an attack on disability rights unprecedented since the emergence of the modern Disability Rights Movement. This paper examines the various ways in which disability rights have been undercut in 2025. To do so, I provide a theoretical framework based in rights theory to reveal the precarity of disability rights and the strategy behind the actions taken by the Trump administration. I examine four key strategies to undercut disability rights: constructing disabled people as unworthy of the status of rights-bearer, constructing threats and conflicts across rights, dismantling the infrastructure of positive rights, and rejecting the value of disability rights across relational sites. Moreover, I argue that in part the effectiveness of contemporary attacks are deeply related to American history, because disability rights have always been contentious and left vulnerable to attack.

SocietiesVol. 16(1)
Shippensburg University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.