Assessing the effectiveness and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound in treating venous insufficiency using a hemodynamic approach

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment in Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI) using a hemodynamic approach.MethodsThis real-world, observational, and retrospective study analyzed 80 patients with CVI from stage C2 to C5 (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification). A single vascular surgeon included and treated all patients consecutively between September 2022 and July 2023. Outcomes were assessed by Doppler ultrasound at 1-month and 1-year. The primary outcome was technical success (complete/partial occlusion by reducing reflux involving reduction in vein diameter >50%); the secondary outcomes included clinical improvement, measured by the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) with visual analogue scale (VAS) and adverse effects. Descriptive statistics include 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroups were compared using Chi-squared/Fisher's or Student's t-test/Wilcoxon tests.ResultsTreated veins included great saphenous veins (GSV), small saphenous veins (SSV), anterior accessory saphenous veins (AASV), leg perforating veins (LPV), thigh perforating veins (TPV), perineal veins and GSV neocrosses. At 1-month follow-up, technical success reached 80.6% (95% CI 74.8-85.5%) of cases, with optimal outcomes for LPV (94.4%) and GSV (87.5%). Clinical improvement occurred in 78.8% of patients (68.81-86.54%). At baseline, patients were stratified into subgroups according to their CEAP stage. No significant difference in improvement rates was found across these subgroups (C2S: 78.7%, C3: 83.3%, C4: 75%, C5: 85.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.83). However, adverse events occurred in 21.8% of cases, the most frequent being neuropathic pain (5%) and skin burns (5%), all quickly resolved.One-year per-protocol analysis showed maintained technical success at 79% (73.8-83.9%) and clinical improvement at 95.2% (84.2-99.4%) despite the attrition of 36% of participants.ConclusionHIFU treatment demonstrates lasting effectiveness for CVI, particularly on LPV and GSV, with an acceptable safety profile. Limitations include a steep learning curve and anatomical constraints. Further studies are necessary for confirmation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555261418961
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the effectiveness and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound in treating venous insufficiency using a hemodynamic approach

O Chauvel, Sara Chabouni, Mahine Kashi, Rym Zaïmi et al.
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Assessing the effectiveness and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound in treating venous insufficiency using a hemodynamic approach

O Chauvel, Sara Chabouni, Mahine Kashi, Rym Zaïmi, Bassel Dakhil, Jean-Luc Pons, Patrick Bagan
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment in Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI) using a hemodynamic approach.MethodsThis real-world, observational, and retrospective study analyzed 80 patients with CVI from stage C2 to C5 (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification). A single vascular surgeon included and treated all patients consecutively between September 2022 and July 2023. Outcomes were assessed by Doppler ultrasound at 1-month and 1-year. The primary outcome was technical success (complete/partial occlusion by reducing reflux involving reduction in vein diameter >50%); the secondary outcomes included clinical improvement, measured by the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) with visual analogue scale (VAS) and adverse effects. Descriptive statistics include 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroups were compared using Chi-squared/Fisher's or Student's t-test/Wilcoxon tests.ResultsTreated veins included great saphenous veins (GSV), small saphenous veins (SSV), anterior accessory saphenous veins (AASV), leg perforating veins (LPV), thigh perforating veins (TPV), perineal veins and GSV neocrosses. At 1-month follow-up, technical success reached 80.6% (95% CI 74.8-85.5%) of cases, with optimal outcomes for LPV (94.4%) and GSV (87.5%). Clinical improvement occurred in 78.8% of patients (68.81-86.54%). At baseline, patients were stratified into subgroups according to their CEAP stage. No significant difference in improvement rates was found across these subgroups (C2S: 78.7%, C3: 83.3%, C4: 75%, C5: 85.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.83). However, adverse events occurred in 21.8% of cases, the most frequent being neuropathic pain (5%) and skin burns (5%), all quickly resolved.One-year per-protocol analysis showed maintained technical success at 79% (73.8-83.9%) and clinical improvement at 95.2% (84.2-99.4%) despite the attrition of 36% of participants.ConclusionHIFU treatment demonstrates lasting effectiveness for CVI, particularly on LPV and GSV, with an acceptable safety profile. Limitations include a steep learning curve and anatomical constraints. Further studies are necessary for confirmation.

Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.