Revealing the dynamic recrystallization and deformation instability of TiC reinforced AZ61 composites with uniform structure and bimodal grain structure

• The bimodal composite has a higher Q value and larger instability region. • The CDRX mechanism dominates the uniform composite, while both CDRX and DDRX mechanisms dominate the bimodal composite. • At high T and low ε ˙ , the uniform composite prone to GBS, leading to micro-voids. • The occurrence of AGG in bimodal composite leads to instability at high T and low ε ˙ . Although microstructural configuration significantly enhances composites' comprehensive mechanical properties, its influence on hot deformation remains unclear. To investigate the effects of microstructural configurations on hot workability, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) mechanisms and instability mechanisms, hot compression tests were conducted on two TiC/AZ61 composites (bimodal/uniform structures) with constitutive modeling, processing maps, and microstructure observations. The results show that uniform composite exhibits better hot workability, lower deformation activation energy ( Q ) and smaller instability regions than bimodal composite. The uniform composite primarily undergoes continuous DRX (CDRX), while the bimodal composite involves both CDRX and discontinuous DRX (DDRX) mechanisms. At low temperatures ( T ) and high strain rates ( ε ˙ ), the uniform composite achieves sufficient DRX, whereas the bimodal composite experiences only partial DRX accompanied by twinning. At high T and low ε ˙ , the uniform composite is prone to grain boundary sliding (GBS) due to fine grains, causing to micro-voids formation; the bimodal composite undergoes abnormal grain growth (AGG), leading to instability. The favorable hot-processing regions for the bimodal composite are (260–320 °C, 0.0009–0.03 s⁻¹) and (325–370 °C, 0.0001–0.0003 s⁻¹), while those for the uniform composite are (260–310 °C, 0.01–0.1 s⁻¹) and (250–300 °C, 0.0001–0.0005 s⁻¹). This work offers in-depth insights into DRX and deformation instability in magnesium matrix composites with different initial structures. It provides a guidance for their selection of hot working processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Magnesium and Alloys
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2025.101963
Primary Topic
Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revealing the dynamic recrystallization and deformation instability of TiC reinforced AZ61 composites with uniform structure and bimodal grain structure

Wei Feng, Ying Zeng, Lingling Fan, Ran NI et al.
Journal of Magnesium and Alloys
Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
article

Revealing the dynamic recrystallization and deformation instability of TiC reinforced AZ61 composites with uniform structure and bimodal grain structure

Wei Feng, Ying Zeng, Lingling Fan, Ran NI, Kunyang Fan, Zhenyu Zhu, Hajo Dieringa, Gaofeng Quan, Yanyan huang, Lingbao Ren
article en

Abstract

• The bimodal composite has a higher Q value and larger instability region. • The CDRX mechanism dominates the uniform composite, while both CDRX and DDRX mechanisms dominate the bimodal composite. • At high T and low ε ˙ , the uniform composite prone to GBS, leading to micro-voids. • The occurrence of AGG in bimodal composite leads to instability at high T and low ε ˙ . Although microstructural configuration significantly enhances composites' comprehensive mechanical properties, its influence on hot deformation remains unclear. To investigate the effects of microstructural configurations on hot workability, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) mechanisms and instability mechanisms, hot compression tests were conducted on two TiC/AZ61 composites (bimodal/uniform structures) with constitutive modeling, processing maps, and microstructure observations. The results show that uniform composite exhibits better hot workability, lower deformation activation energy ( Q ) and smaller instability regions than bimodal composite. The uniform composite primarily undergoes continuous DRX (CDRX), while the bimodal composite involves both CDRX and discontinuous DRX (DDRX) mechanisms. At low temperatures ( T ) and high strain rates ( ε ˙ ), the uniform composite achieves sufficient DRX, whereas the bimodal composite experiences only partial DRX accompanied by twinning. At high T and low ε ˙ , the uniform composite is prone to grain boundary sliding (GBS) due to fine grains, causing to micro-voids formation; the bimodal composite undergoes abnormal grain growth (AGG), leading to instability. The favorable hot-processing regions for the bimodal composite are (260–320 °C, 0.0009–0.03 s⁻¹) and (325–370 °C, 0.0001–0.0003 s⁻¹), while those for the uniform composite are (260–310 °C, 0.01–0.1 s⁻¹) and (250–300 °C, 0.0001–0.0005 s⁻¹). This work offers in-depth insights into DRX and deformation instability in magnesium matrix composites with different initial structures. It provides a guidance for their selection of hot working processes.

Journal of Magnesium and AlloysVol. 15
Chengdu University (CN), Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.