Artificial intelligence literacy at school: A systematic review with a focus on psychological foundations

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is significantly changing school education. The increasing prevalence of AI calls for a framework of AI-related literacy specifically tailored to the educational context. A growing body of research has attempted to conceptualise AI literacy (AIL) from different disciplinary perspectives and with different foci. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of definitions and psychological dimensions of AIL in school education by addressing the following questions: how is AIL defined and conceptualised, what are the dimensions of AIL, and what psychological dimensions are included. A total of 2642 records were identified from various databases, and 58 peer-reviewed articles were retrieved for this systematic review, which strictly followed the PRISMA guidelines. The findings propose different definitions of AIL for teachers, students and other educational professionals, and identifies dimensions that include cognitive, emotional, psychological, and behavioural constructs. More detailed, the review identifies six dimensions for teachers, such as contextual knowledge and continuous professional growth. For students, eight dimensions were identified, including AI-related thinking capacity and preparation for AI careers. Certain dimensions, such as AI knowledge and skills, AI ethics and societal implications, generative AI-specific competency, and most importantly, the psychological dimension consisting of cognitive and non-cognitive elements, were found to be shared across all target groups. Furthermore, personalisation and contextual adaptability emerged as additional key dimensions. In sum, the findings offer valuable insights for future research and practical guidance for decision-making in AI education, particularly in the areas of curriculum design, implementation, and assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100551
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence literacy at school: A systematic review with a focus on psychological foundations

Astrid Carolus, Shuyan Feng
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Artificial intelligence literacy at school: A systematic review with a focus on psychological foundations

Astrid Carolus, Shuyan Feng
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is significantly changing school education. The increasing prevalence of AI calls for a framework of AI-related literacy specifically tailored to the educational context. A growing body of research has attempted to conceptualise AI literacy (AIL) from different disciplinary perspectives and with different foci. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of definitions and psychological dimensions of AIL in school education by addressing the following questions: how is AIL defined and conceptualised, what are the dimensions of AIL, and what psychological dimensions are included. A total of 2642 records were identified from various databases, and 58 peer-reviewed articles were retrieved for this systematic review, which strictly followed the PRISMA guidelines. The findings propose different definitions of AIL for teachers, students and other educational professionals, and identifies dimensions that include cognitive, emotional, psychological, and behavioural constructs. More detailed, the review identifies six dimensions for teachers, such as contextual knowledge and continuous professional growth. For students, eight dimensions were identified, including AI-related thinking capacity and preparation for AI careers. Certain dimensions, such as AI knowledge and skills, AI ethics and societal implications, generative AI-specific competency, and most importantly, the psychological dimension consisting of cognitive and non-cognitive elements, were found to be shared across all target groups. Furthermore, personalisation and contextual adaptability emerged as additional key dimensions. In sum, the findings offer valuable insights for future research and practical guidance for decision-making in AI education, particularly in the areas of curriculum design, implementation, and assessment.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 10
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.