Updated recommendations for the design of therapeutic trials for neonatal seizures

The International Neonatal Consortium Seizure Working Group of the Critical Path Institute provides an update to the original recommendations for design of clinical trials to treat neonatal seizures based on recent experiences from several trials and developments in the field. Although there aren't sufficient new data to inform definitions of optimal efficacy endpoints, the Working Group recommended inclusion of alternate measures of seizure burden reduction as secondary or exploratory endpoints, to elucidate clinically meaningful efficacy endpoints for future trials. It was recommended to include additional key covariates, such as timing of seizure onset/cessation, randomization, and ASM administration. There are new recommendations regarding potential for unmasked or single-masked trials, and reporting of concomitant medications and adverse events, and genetic testing. Importantly, specific recommendations were added regarding improved strategies for recruitment and consent, including the use of novel technologies and the involvement of patient advocacy groups. Recommendations regarding trial infrastructure and operational feasibility were included to facilitate trial initiation and conduct, given the many logistical challenges of conducting neonatal seizure treatment trials. Finally, the recommendations consider accommodations for local or national regulations and resources, to ensure that trials are conducted as appropriate to the setting in which the patients are treated. IMPACT: This review provides an update to the initial recommendations for neonatal seizure treatment trial design, with recommendations regarding: (1) exploratory endpoints to inform future trials, (2) additional key covariates to include, (3) considerations regarding masking of investigators, (3) inclusion of concomitant medications and adverse events, (4) genetic testing, (5) strategies for recruitment and consent, and (6) infrastructure and operational feasibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Research
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04735-1
Primary Topic
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updated recommendations for the design of therapeutic trials for neonatal seizures

H Rabe, Cia M. Sharpe, Collin A. Hovinga, Sonya Wang et al.
Pediatric Research
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
article

Updated recommendations for the design of therapeutic trials for neonatal seizures

H Rabe, Cia M. Sharpe, Collin A. Hovinga, Sonya Wang, Scott C. Denne, Faisal Ali, Ronit Pressler, Hannah C. Glass, Christine T. Barry, Marilee C Allen, Stéphane Auvin, Janet S. Soul, Neil Marlow, Agnes V. Klein, Betsy Pilon, Kanwaljit Singh
article en

Abstract

The International Neonatal Consortium Seizure Working Group of the Critical Path Institute provides an update to the original recommendations for design of clinical trials to treat neonatal seizures based on recent experiences from several trials and developments in the field. Although there aren't sufficient new data to inform definitions of optimal efficacy endpoints, the Working Group recommended inclusion of alternate measures of seizure burden reduction as secondary or exploratory endpoints, to elucidate clinically meaningful efficacy endpoints for future trials. It was recommended to include additional key covariates, such as timing of seizure onset/cessation, randomization, and ASM administration. There are new recommendations regarding potential for unmasked or single-masked trials, and reporting of concomitant medications and adverse events, and genetic testing. Importantly, specific recommendations were added regarding improved strategies for recruitment and consent, including the use of novel technologies and the involvement of patient advocacy groups. Recommendations regarding trial infrastructure and operational feasibility were included to facilitate trial initiation and conduct, given the many logistical challenges of conducting neonatal seizure treatment trials. Finally, the recommendations consider accommodations for local or national regulations and resources, to ensure that trials are conducted as appropriate to the setting in which the patients are treated. IMPACT: This review provides an update to the initial recommendations for neonatal seizure treatment trial design, with recommendations regarding: (1) exploratory endpoints to inform future trials, (2) additional key covariates to include, (3) considerations regarding masking of investigators, (3) inclusion of concomitant medications and adverse events, (4) genetic testing, (5) strategies for recruitment and consent, and (6) infrastructure and operational feasibility.

Pediatric Research
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Health Canada (CA), Kennedy Krieger Institute (US), University of Minnesota (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Inserm (FR), Délégation Paris 7 (FR), University of California, San Francisco (US), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Royal Sussex County Hospital (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Critical Path Institute (US), University of California San Diego (US), Hôpital Robert-Debré (FR), MNGI Digestive Health (US), Cranbrook Academy of Art (US), Starship Children's Health (NZ), University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Innovative Research (United States) (US), NeuroDiderot (FR), Indiana University School of Medicine, University College London (GB), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Tufts Medical Center, University College London, University College Cork, Hospital for Sick Children, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.