Important characteristics and roles of near-peer mentors for engaging students in informal mathematics learning
Purpose The aim of this paper is to explore the characteristics and roles of near-peers in mentoring and influencing high school students in an informal mathematics learning environment. Design/methodology/approach Eight college students (six male and two female) participated in the “Follow Me into Math” (FMiM) project as near-peer mentors. Participants engaged in focus groups. Analysis of the focus groups employed a thematic narrative approach. Additionally, a priori themes were integrated to investigate the near-peer mentors’ perspectives on the characteristics needed to fulfill their roles and support their mentees. Findings Data from focus groups with eight near-peer mentors showed that the most influential mentors’ characteristics were those that supported mentees’ psychosocial functioning. Research limitations/implications The responses from the near-peers may have been influenced by pre-existing notions of the role of a mentor and their characteristics, shaped by past experiences or driven by socially acceptable opinions. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by offering insights into the key characteristics needed to effectively engage younger mentees in educational settings, as seen from the perspective of near-peer mentors. It highlights important considerations for ensuring near-peer mentors are well-suited for their mentoring roles.
Authors
- Aaron T. Wilson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-3790)
- Sergey Grigorian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3193-5936)
- Xiaohui Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3534-8221)
- Mayra Lizeth Ortiz Galarza
Institutions
- The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education
- Published
- 2026-01-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-05-2024-0058
- Primary Topic
- Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00