Uniform for All? A Framing Experiment on the Acceptance of a Gender-Neutral Compulsory Service in Switzerland

In light of increasing military conflicts within and outside Europe, as well as demands for more appropriate representation of women, gender‐neutral military service has become a topic of public debate. Building on research on framing effects, this article examines which factors influence public acceptance of gender‐neutral military service. Using original data from a survey experiment with a representative sample of over 1,500 respondents in Switzerland, we examine the acceptance of a corresponding reform proposal. We show that overall acceptance is relatively insensitive to different types of frames. Only gender‐neutral framing (i.e., a frame does not mention specific genders) increased acceptance among respondents. Acceptance depended most on how strongly respondents would be affected by such a reform, particularly because of their gender, as well as on their perception of Switzerland's security and the necessity of the army. Framing strategies therefore only increase the acceptance of gender‐neutral compulsory service to a limited extent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/94006
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uniform for All? A Framing Experiment on the Acceptance of a Gender-Neutral Compulsory Service in Switzerland

Johanna Hornung, Basil Vifian
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Uniform for All? A Framing Experiment on the Acceptance of a Gender-Neutral Compulsory Service in Switzerland

Johanna Hornung, Basil Vifian
article en

Abstract

In light of increasing military conflicts within and outside Europe, as well as demands for more appropriate representation of women, gender‐neutral military service has become a topic of public debate. Building on research on framing effects, this article examines which factors influence public acceptance of gender‐neutral military service. Using original data from a survey experiment with a representative sample of over 1,500 respondents in Switzerland, we examine the acceptance of a corresponding reform proposal. We show that overall acceptance is relatively insensitive to different types of frames. Only gender‐neutral framing (i.e., a frame does not mention specific genders) increased acceptance among respondents. Acceptance depended most on how strongly respondents would be affected by such a reform, particularly because of their gender, as well as on their perception of Switzerland's security and the necessity of the army. Framing strategies therefore only increase the acceptance of gender‐neutral compulsory service to a limited extent.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs (DE), Public Works (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.