How deep is your soil? Quantifying and spatially analyzing understudied deep soil in the United States

Deep soil is largely understudied despite its importance for understanding terrestrial biogeochemical processes. Here, understudied soil is defined as the difference between soil studied to a reported depth and the estimated depth to bedrock. To assess deep soil across the US, we quantified and spatially analyzed understudied soil using soil survey data and model estimates of bedrock depth. We derived an equation to estimate understudied soil using the dataset parameters “max lower depth studied”, “depth to bedrock”, and “likelihood of bedrock in the top 200 cm”. Survey data and bedrock model outputs revealed that soil has been studied to an average depth of 1.4 m, and the average depth to bedrock is 26 m in the US. The greatest amounts of understudied soil occur in the Midwest and the Southwest. Soil data density was highest in regions with greater population density, specifically, the Pacific region (excluding Alaska), the Midwest, and the Northeast. In contrast, Alaska, the Mountain region and South were underrepresented. To understand soil diversity and any taxonomic bias of the global soil data available, soil orders in the dataset were compared with US-based National Resource Conservation Service areal percentages. Oxisols, Alfisols, Ultisols, Andisols, and Histosols were overrepresented, whereas Gelisols, Aridisols, Vertisols, Entisols, and Spodosols were markedly understudied.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117697
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How deep is your soil? Quantifying and spatially analyzing understudied deep soil in the United States

Caley K. Gasch, Susan E. Crow, Michael S. Strickland, Rodrigo Vargas et al.
Geoderma
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

How deep is your soil? Quantifying and spatially analyzing understudied deep soil in the United States

Caley K. Gasch, Susan E. Crow, Michael S. Strickland, Rodrigo Vargas, Noah Fierer, Natalie Cowan, Zeli Tan, Kristy I. Lam, Gabrielle J. Feber, Rosmery Cruz-O’Byrne, Rebecca S. Collins, Zachary E. Kayler, David G. Williams, Emmanuel Komolafe
article en

Abstract

Deep soil is largely understudied despite its importance for understanding terrestrial biogeochemical processes. Here, understudied soil is defined as the difference between soil studied to a reported depth and the estimated depth to bedrock. To assess deep soil across the US, we quantified and spatially analyzed understudied soil using soil survey data and model estimates of bedrock depth. We derived an equation to estimate understudied soil using the dataset parameters “max lower depth studied”, “depth to bedrock”, and “likelihood of bedrock in the top 200 cm”. Survey data and bedrock model outputs revealed that soil has been studied to an average depth of 1.4 m, and the average depth to bedrock is 26 m in the US. The greatest amounts of understudied soil occur in the Midwest and the Southwest. Soil data density was highest in regions with greater population density, specifically, the Pacific region (excluding Alaska), the Midwest, and the Northeast. In contrast, Alaska, the Mountain region and South were underrepresented. To understand soil diversity and any taxonomic bias of the global soil data available, soil orders in the dataset were compared with US-based National Resource Conservation Service areal percentages. Oxisols, Alfisols, Ultisols, Andisols, and Histosols were overrepresented, whereas Gelisols, Aridisols, Vertisols, Entisols, and Spodosols were markedly understudied.

GeodermaVol. 466
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.