Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models in Radiographic Image Analysis for Predicting Hip and Knee Prosthesis Failure: A Systematic Review

<b>Background and objectives</b>: The increasing volume of total hip and knee arthroplasty created a significant postoperative surveillance burden. While plain radiographs are standard, the detection of aseptic loosening is subjective. This review evaluates the state of the art regarding AI in radiographic analysis for identifying aseptic loosening and mechanical failure in primary hip and knee prostheses. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane was conducted up to November 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies describing AI tools applied to radiographs for detecting aseptic loosening or implant failure were included. Studies focusing on infection or acute complications were excluded. <b>Results</b>: Ten studies published between 2020 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. In internal testing, AI models demonstrated high diagnostic capability, with accuracies ranging from 83.9% to 97.5% and AUC values between 0.86 and 0.99. A performance drop was observed during external validation. Emerging trends include the integration of clinical variables and the use of sequential imaging. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI models show robust potential to match or outperform standard radiographic interpretation for detecting failure. Clinical deployment is limited by variable performance on external datasets. Future research must prioritize robust multi-institutional validation, explainability, and integration of longitudinal data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13010122
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models in Radiographic Image Analysis for Predicting Hip and Knee Prosthesis Failure: A Systematic Review

Guido Grappiolo, Marco Di Maio, Riccardo Stuani, Katia Chiappetta et al.
Bioengineering
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models in Radiographic Image Analysis for Predicting Hip and Knee Prosthesis Failure: A Systematic Review

Guido Grappiolo, Marco Di Maio, Riccardo Stuani, Katia Chiappetta, Vincenzo Di Matteo, Mattia Loppini
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and objectives</b>: The increasing volume of total hip and knee arthroplasty created a significant postoperative surveillance burden. While plain radiographs are standard, the detection of aseptic loosening is subjective. This review evaluates the state of the art regarding AI in radiographic analysis for identifying aseptic loosening and mechanical failure in primary hip and knee prostheses. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane was conducted up to November 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies describing AI tools applied to radiographs for detecting aseptic loosening or implant failure were included. Studies focusing on infection or acute complications were excluded. <b>Results</b>: Ten studies published between 2020 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. In internal testing, AI models demonstrated high diagnostic capability, with accuracies ranging from 83.9% to 97.5% and AUC values between 0.86 and 0.99. A performance drop was observed during external validation. Emerging trends include the integration of clinical variables and the use of sequential imaging. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI models show robust potential to match or outperform standard radiographic interpretation for detecting failure. Clinical deployment is limited by variable performance on external datasets. Future research must prioritize robust multi-institutional validation, explainability, and integration of longitudinal data.

BioengineeringVol. 13(1)
Humanitas University (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.