Indecision and recency-weighted evidence integration in non-clinical and clinical settings
Biases in information gathering are common in the general population and reach pathological extremes in paralysing indecisiveness, as in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Here we adopt a new perspective on information gathering and demonstrate an information integration bias whereby there is over-weighting of most recent information via evidence strength updates (ΔES). In a crowd-sourced sample (N = 5,237), we find that a reduced ΔES weighting drives indecisiveness along an obsessive-compulsive spectrum. We replicate this attenuated ΔES weighting in a second lab-based study (N = 105) that includes a transdiagnostic obsessive-compulsive spectrum encompassing OCD and generalized anxiety patients. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we trace ΔES signals to a late neural signal peaking at ~920 ms. Critically, highly obsessive-compulsive participants, across diagnoses, show an attenuated neural ΔES signal in mediofrontal areas, while other decision-relevant processes remain intact. Our findings establish biased information weighting as a driver of information gathering, where attenuated ΔES is linked to indecisiveness across an obsessive-compulsive spectrum.
Institutions
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Centre for Mental Health (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Prostate Cancer Research (GB)
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research (CN)
- Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing (DE)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2026-01-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02385-1
- Primary Topic
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Wellcome Trust
- Leverhulme Trust
- Jacobs Foundation
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft