Reducing Health Inequities in Australia: The Role of Place‐Based Action and Spatial Data Infrastructure

Australia holds one of the world's highest life expectancies, yet stark geographic inequities persist. In Queensland, the gap in median age of death between communities only 85 km apart reaches 26 years for men and 22 years for women. While national policies increasingly endorse "health-in-all-policies" and place-based approaches, their impact depends on the ability to identify, target and monitor inequities at fine geographic scales. Spatially referenced data and analytic techniques provide a critical foundation for this work, enabling baseline assessments, tailored interventions, and rigorous evaluation. To fully realise this potential, commonwealth and federal governments must commit to sharing spatially open data, invest in capacity-building for its use, and foster transdisciplinary collaboration. Without these supports, the promise of place-based health perspectives to tackle health inequities will remain unrealised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.70156
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing Health Inequities in Australia: The Role of Place‐Based Action and Spatial Data Infrastructure

Jonathan Olsen, Mia Robinson, Jonathan Corcoran, Lisa McDaid
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Reducing Health Inequities in Australia: The Role of Place‐Based Action and Spatial Data Infrastructure

Jonathan Olsen, Mia Robinson, Jonathan Corcoran, Lisa McDaid
article en

Abstract

Australia holds one of the world's highest life expectancies, yet stark geographic inequities persist. In Queensland, the gap in median age of death between communities only 85 km apart reaches 26 years for men and 22 years for women. While national policies increasingly endorse "health-in-all-policies" and place-based approaches, their impact depends on the ability to identify, target and monitor inequities at fine geographic scales. Spatially referenced data and analytic techniques provide a critical foundation for this work, enabling baseline assessments, tailored interventions, and rigorous evaluation. To fully realise this potential, commonwealth and federal governments must commit to sharing spatially open data, invest in capacity-building for its use, and foster transdisciplinary collaboration. Without these supports, the promise of place-based health perspectives to tackle health inequities will remain unrealised.

Health Promotion Journal of AustraliaVol. 37(2)
The University of Queensland (AU)
University of Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reducing Health Inequities in Australia: The Role of Place‐Based Action and Spatial Data Infrastructure — Jonathan Olsen, Mia Robinson, et al. · Health Promotion Journal of Australia (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS