First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced and Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma: Doxorubicin vs. Gemcitabine—A Systematic Review

<b>Background</b>: Leiomyosarcomas are an aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma that arise from smooth muscle, have a high metastatic potential and account for 10-20% of soft-tissue sarcomas. Despite decades of research, the first-line treatment remains unresolved due to the absence of direct comparative trials, heterogeneous study designs, and trade-offs between efficacy and toxicity. This systematic review evaluates the optimal therapeutic systemic chemotherapy regimens in the first-line setting, specifically gemcitabine- and doxorubicin-based regimens, including associated toxicities. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) identified studies of first-line gemcitabine- or doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for leiomyosarcoma. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261280028). Of the 3092 articles screened, 11 articles were eligible for inclusion, comprising results from 1225 patients. Eligible studies were in English and included ≥10 patients with advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma reporting on LMS-specific outcomes and no prior systemic therapy. This qualitative systematic review synthesizes prospective and retrospective evidence without quantitative meta-analysis. <b>Results</b>: The review included two phase 3 trials, six phase 2 trials, one phase 1b trial, and two retrospective studies. While there was no direct comparison in this setting, doxorubicin-based combinations consistently reported higher objective response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The most favorable outcomes were observed in the LMS04 trial with doxorubicin plus trabectedin followed by surgery and trabectedin maintenance, yielding a median progression-free survival of 12 months, overall survival of 33 months, and objective response rate of 36%. This regimen also had the highest grade 3-4 toxicity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Doxorubicin-based regimens remain the most active first-line option for leiomyosarcoma, although treatment practices remain heterogeneous.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020335
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced and Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma: Doxorubicin vs. Gemcitabine—A Systematic Review

Ravin Ratan, Elise F. Nassif, Priyal Agarwal, Ilma Khan et al.
Cancers
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced and Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma: Doxorubicin vs. Gemcitabine—A Systematic Review

Ravin Ratan, Elise F. Nassif, Priyal Agarwal, Ilma Khan, Nassar El Assaad
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Leiomyosarcomas are an aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma that arise from smooth muscle, have a high metastatic potential and account for 10-20% of soft-tissue sarcomas. Despite decades of research, the first-line treatment remains unresolved due to the absence of direct comparative trials, heterogeneous study designs, and trade-offs between efficacy and toxicity. This systematic review evaluates the optimal therapeutic systemic chemotherapy regimens in the first-line setting, specifically gemcitabine- and doxorubicin-based regimens, including associated toxicities. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) identified studies of first-line gemcitabine- or doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for leiomyosarcoma. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261280028). Of the 3092 articles screened, 11 articles were eligible for inclusion, comprising results from 1225 patients. Eligible studies were in English and included ≥10 patients with advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma reporting on LMS-specific outcomes and no prior systemic therapy. This qualitative systematic review synthesizes prospective and retrospective evidence without quantitative meta-analysis. <b>Results</b>: The review included two phase 3 trials, six phase 2 trials, one phase 1b trial, and two retrospective studies. While there was no direct comparison in this setting, doxorubicin-based combinations consistently reported higher objective response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The most favorable outcomes were observed in the LMS04 trial with doxorubicin plus trabectedin followed by surgery and trabectedin maintenance, yielding a median progression-free survival of 12 months, overall survival of 33 months, and objective response rate of 36%. This regimen also had the highest grade 3-4 toxicity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Doxorubicin-based regimens remain the most active first-line option for leiomyosarcoma, although treatment practices remain heterogeneous.

CancersVol. 18(2)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.