Art as a meaningful environment: an integrative model of aesthetic engagement and interpretation

This paper proposes a novel framework for aesthetic experience by conceptualizing artworks as <i>proto-environments</i>-structured, dynamic spaces where meaning emerges through the synthesis of perception, cognition, and embodied interaction. This reframes art from a representational object to a bounded, communicative environment that actively invites engagement. While the model is developed through visual art, it generalizes across material, temporal, and conceptual forms. The framework rests on two integrated mechanisms. First, the distal-proximal continuum of aesthetic engagement differentiates modes of structural engagement along a fluid, non-categorical spectrum: distal engagement emphasizes imaginal projection, whereas proximal engagement involves direct sensorimotor interaction. Artworks typically activate both, producing a blended structural profile. Second, the functional-to-aesthetic stance serves as the interpretive filter that directs how the structural profile is understood. Drawing from the container schema, ecological affordance theory, and the cooperative principle, the stance determines whether embodied inputs are treated primarily as objective structure (external locus) or as non-utilitarian, communicative meaning (internal locus). Once the aesthetic stance is adopted, the artwork's internal locus functions as a meaning-directed environment organized by the same fundamental dimensions as the physical world-space, time, and materiality. Aesthetic meaning emerges through the viewer's embodied negotiation of this structured environment across the distal-proximal range. This perspective reframes artworks not as static messages to decode, but as dynamic fields of engagement whose aesthetic status is determined by how the stance prioritizes embodied inputs as metaphorical content, shaping how bodies move, feel, and think within both physical and imaginal space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1677529
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Art as a meaningful environment: an integrative model of aesthetic engagement and interpretation

Melissa J. Dolese
Frontiers in Psychology
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

Art as a meaningful environment: an integrative model of aesthetic engagement and interpretation

Melissa J. Dolese
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel framework for aesthetic experience by conceptualizing artworks as <i>proto-environments</i>-structured, dynamic spaces where meaning emerges through the synthesis of perception, cognition, and embodied interaction. This reframes art from a representational object to a bounded, communicative environment that actively invites engagement. While the model is developed through visual art, it generalizes across material, temporal, and conceptual forms. The framework rests on two integrated mechanisms. First, the distal-proximal continuum of aesthetic engagement differentiates modes of structural engagement along a fluid, non-categorical spectrum: distal engagement emphasizes imaginal projection, whereas proximal engagement involves direct sensorimotor interaction. Artworks typically activate both, producing a blended structural profile. Second, the functional-to-aesthetic stance serves as the interpretive filter that directs how the structural profile is understood. Drawing from the container schema, ecological affordance theory, and the cooperative principle, the stance determines whether embodied inputs are treated primarily as objective structure (external locus) or as non-utilitarian, communicative meaning (internal locus). Once the aesthetic stance is adopted, the artwork's internal locus functions as a meaning-directed environment organized by the same fundamental dimensions as the physical world-space, time, and materiality. Aesthetic meaning emerges through the viewer's embodied negotiation of this structured environment across the distal-proximal range. This perspective reframes artworks not as static messages to decode, but as dynamic fields of engagement whose aesthetic status is determined by how the stance prioritizes embodied inputs as metaphorical content, shaping how bodies move, feel, and think within both physical and imaginal space.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
University of Alaska Southeast (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.