Managing sustainability tensions under disruptive conditions: the role of cumulative operations and network capabilities

Purpose This study explores how manufacturing plants navigate tensions between economic and social-ecological priorities during high-impact, low-frequency (HILF) disruptions, which are conceptually understood as combining environmental uncertainty and internal resource constraints. It investigates whether cumulatively developed operations and network capabilities help mitigate trade-offs that arise under such conditions. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on paradox theory and cumulative capability models, the study applies partial least squares structural equation modelling and sequence testing to survey data from 135 automotive plants before and after COVID-19. Tensions are examined through observed trade-off patterns between traditional operations and sustainability capabilities. We clarify the scope by positioning HILF as contextual, and we support this with archival indicators. Findings The results suggest that plants which had developed capabilities cumulatively, following the Sand Cone sequence prior to disruption, experienced fewer trade-offs during the crisis. A high level of network capabilities prior to disruption further reduced trade-offs and enabled plants to either maintain or develop social-ecological sustainability capabilities under disruption conditions. Surprisingly, many of the analysed plants had not followed the Sand Cone sequence before the crisis, which exacerbated trade-offs during disruption. Originality/value The study re-examines the Sand Cone model within a HILF disruption context and proposes an extended Supply Chain Sand Cone model that integrates cumulative operations capabilities within plants with network capabilities across supply chains. It shows how manufacturing plants can manage sustainability-related tensions between economic and social-ecological priorities through paradoxical responses of temporal separation via cumulative capability development and spatial separation via the integration of network capabilities. Practical implications include the value of deliberate sequencing and supply network integration to support sustainability under crisis conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-09-2024-0352
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing sustainability tensions under disruptive conditions: the role of cumulative operations and network capabilities

Aseem Kinra, Piotr Warmbier, Ajay Das
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Managing sustainability tensions under disruptive conditions: the role of cumulative operations and network capabilities

Aseem Kinra, Piotr Warmbier, Ajay Das
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study explores how manufacturing plants navigate tensions between economic and social-ecological priorities during high-impact, low-frequency (HILF) disruptions, which are conceptually understood as combining environmental uncertainty and internal resource constraints. It investigates whether cumulatively developed operations and network capabilities help mitigate trade-offs that arise under such conditions. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on paradox theory and cumulative capability models, the study applies partial least squares structural equation modelling and sequence testing to survey data from 135 automotive plants before and after COVID-19. Tensions are examined through observed trade-off patterns between traditional operations and sustainability capabilities. We clarify the scope by positioning HILF as contextual, and we support this with archival indicators. Findings The results suggest that plants which had developed capabilities cumulatively, following the Sand Cone sequence prior to disruption, experienced fewer trade-offs during the crisis. A high level of network capabilities prior to disruption further reduced trade-offs and enabled plants to either maintain or develop social-ecological sustainability capabilities under disruption conditions. Surprisingly, many of the analysed plants had not followed the Sand Cone sequence before the crisis, which exacerbated trade-offs during disruption. Originality/value The study re-examines the Sand Cone model within a HILF disruption context and proposes an extended Supply Chain Sand Cone model that integrates cumulative operations capabilities within plants with network capabilities across supply chains. It shows how manufacturing plants can manage sustainability-related tensions between economic and social-ecological priorities through paradoxical responses of temporal separation via cumulative capability development and spatial separation via the integration of network capabilities. Practical implications include the value of deliberate sequencing and supply network integration to support sustainability under crisis conditions.

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics ManagementVol. 56(11)
Baruch College (US), Hochschule Bremen (DE), University of Bremen (DE), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Heriot-Watt University Malaysia (MY), Institut für Seeverkehrswirtschaft und Logistik (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.