Exploring beliefs, intentions, and expectations towards cured meat alternatives: A qualitative analysis based on the theory of planned behaviour and product tasting

Cured meats consumption presents a dual challenge due to the presence of carcinogens formed from nitrites and the broader need to reduce overall meat intake. This study aimed to better understand individuals beliefs, intentions, and expectations of cured meat alternatives. This was done avoiding treating meat reduction as a general issue isolated from meat-based products, as is often the case, and instead focusing on a specific product category and cultural context, considering both plant-based and healthier, nitrite-free, meat-based alternatives as they appear in real-world decision-making contexts. To do so, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted based on a combination of the Theory of Planned Behaviour with an experiential tasting component. Reflexive Thematic Analysis was then employed to enable a deeper exploration of psychological constructs alongside real-life responses. Results showed that while participants recognised environmental, health, and ethical benefits in plant-based cured meat alternatives, they also expressed concerns, particularly around social judgment, convenience, and perceived ambiguity about the products. Nitrite-free options were generally viewed more favourably, with clearer health benefits and fewer disadvantages. Cost emerged as a common barrier for both categories. Sensory expectations, perceptions of naturalness, and social influences shaped participants’ intentions. Interestingly, purchase intent increased after tasting for both categories. Regarding plant-based alternatives, ambiguity emerged as a key theme. Participants struggled to understand their diverse range and categorise them within familiar food groups, which reduced their perceived control over the products. These outcomes aim to inform future research employing quantitative analysis and to support interventions in the field of protein transition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Future Foods
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2026.100912
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring beliefs, intentions, and expectations towards cured meat alternatives: A qualitative analysis based on the theory of planned behaviour and product tasting

Niamh Harbourne, Declan J. Bolton, Emily Crofton, Stergios Melios
Future Foods
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Exploring beliefs, intentions, and expectations towards cured meat alternatives: A qualitative analysis based on the theory of planned behaviour and product tasting

Niamh Harbourne, Declan J. Bolton, Emily Crofton, Stergios Melios
article en

Abstract

Cured meats consumption presents a dual challenge due to the presence of carcinogens formed from nitrites and the broader need to reduce overall meat intake. This study aimed to better understand individuals beliefs, intentions, and expectations of cured meat alternatives. This was done avoiding treating meat reduction as a general issue isolated from meat-based products, as is often the case, and instead focusing on a specific product category and cultural context, considering both plant-based and healthier, nitrite-free, meat-based alternatives as they appear in real-world decision-making contexts. To do so, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted based on a combination of the Theory of Planned Behaviour with an experiential tasting component. Reflexive Thematic Analysis was then employed to enable a deeper exploration of psychological constructs alongside real-life responses. Results showed that while participants recognised environmental, health, and ethical benefits in plant-based cured meat alternatives, they also expressed concerns, particularly around social judgment, convenience, and perceived ambiguity about the products. Nitrite-free options were generally viewed more favourably, with clearer health benefits and fewer disadvantages. Cost emerged as a common barrier for both categories. Sensory expectations, perceptions of naturalness, and social influences shaped participants’ intentions. Interestingly, purchase intent increased after tasting for both categories. Regarding plant-based alternatives, ambiguity emerged as a key theme. Participants struggled to understand their diverse range and categorise them within familiar food groups, which reduced their perceived control over the products. These outcomes aim to inform future research employing quantitative analysis and to support interventions in the field of protein transition.

Future FoodsVol. 13
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring beliefs, intentions, and expectations towards cured meat alternatives: A qualitative analysis based on the theory of planned behaviour and product tasting — Niamh Harbourne, Declan J. Bolton, et al. · Future Foods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS