Drawing systems of stewardship to guide action and reveal critical relationships of care

Abstract Environmental action, including that which addresses climate change and takes care of the environment more broadly, could be strengthened by making collaboration across silos more imaginable. In this technical article, we describe a “systems of care” tool that facilitates a broad range of participants to express the local and everyday relations that underpin care for their places and communities. Researchers and practitioners who aim to bring together participants from different sectors can implement the tool, using drawings and narrations of these systems of stewardship and care, to find connections and disconnections between participants. Reflexive questions can be tailored to fit the participants, but aim to identify important relations in the system and actions to strengthen them. We show the use of the tool in two case studies: one as part of a community workshop on climate adaptation in New York City and another in a digital workshop with artists and urban greening practitioners across the world as part of The Nature of Cities Virtual Festival. Through this tool, we can see, in real time, how hyper‐local actions and relations can thread into wider networks of environmental stewardship and community care. In particular, the tool unveils aspects of environmental stewardship often uncaptured by other research methods, such as the non‐environmental organizations and relations that sustain caretakers. It also allows participants from different contexts to dialogue, finding both common and different elements across their practice and strengthening relationships between them. Finally, it can expand the conceptual and geographic lens at which stewardship is understood by bringing attention to how relations across thematic silos and large physical distances can support local environmental actions. By starting with the relations, actions, and places that already exist, the tool promotes a relational understanding of people‐place‐organization connections and disconnections that can strengthen the overall system of care while working to repair relationships in environmental governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth stewardship.
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eas2.70040
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drawing systems of stewardship to guide action and reveal critical relationships of care

Natalia C. Piland, Erika Svendsen, Lindsay K. Campbell, Michelle Leigh Johnson
Earth stewardship.
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Drawing systems of stewardship to guide action and reveal critical relationships of care

Natalia C. Piland, Erika Svendsen, Lindsay K. Campbell, Michelle Leigh Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Environmental action, including that which addresses climate change and takes care of the environment more broadly, could be strengthened by making collaboration across silos more imaginable. In this technical article, we describe a “systems of care” tool that facilitates a broad range of participants to express the local and everyday relations that underpin care for their places and communities. Researchers and practitioners who aim to bring together participants from different sectors can implement the tool, using drawings and narrations of these systems of stewardship and care, to find connections and disconnections between participants. Reflexive questions can be tailored to fit the participants, but aim to identify important relations in the system and actions to strengthen them. We show the use of the tool in two case studies: one as part of a community workshop on climate adaptation in New York City and another in a digital workshop with artists and urban greening practitioners across the world as part of The Nature of Cities Virtual Festival. Through this tool, we can see, in real time, how hyper‐local actions and relations can thread into wider networks of environmental stewardship and community care. In particular, the tool unveils aspects of environmental stewardship often uncaptured by other research methods, such as the non‐environmental organizations and relations that sustain caretakers. It also allows participants from different contexts to dialogue, finding both common and different elements across their practice and strengthening relationships between them. Finally, it can expand the conceptual and geographic lens at which stewardship is understood by bringing attention to how relations across thematic silos and large physical distances can support local environmental actions. By starting with the relations, actions, and places that already exist, the tool promotes a relational understanding of people‐place‐organization connections and disconnections that can strengthen the overall system of care while working to repair relationships in environmental governance.

Earth stewardship.Vol. 3(1)
Northern Research Station (US), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Carleton College, U.S. Forest Service
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.