The φ-Compression Law: Golden Ratio Optimization in Neural Architecture

We report a conservation law governing neural network compression: when layer widths follow golden ratio (φ ≈ 1.618) scaling via Lucas numbers, the product of efficiency gain and parameter retention equals unity: efficiency × retention = 1.0004 ≈ 1 Systematic experiments across 216 training runs and four neural network architectures reveal that φ-based (Lucas) scaling achieves 2.81 ± 0.07× parameter efficiency gains with 64.4 ± 0.9% parameter reduction in convolutional networks (SimpleCNN, ResNet-18, ConvNeXt-Tiny), while showing exactly no effect in Vision Transformers. The efficiency gain approaches Euler's number (e ≈ 2.718, 3.4% deviation) and the retention fraction approaches 1/e (≈ 0.368, 3.3% deviation), suggesting a deep connection between golden ratio architecture and information-theoretic optimality. The transformer null result is not a failure but a prediction: φ-scaling benefits hierarchical/cascaded processing, which CNNs possess inherently through width progression but standard transformers lack due to uniform layer structure. We propose and preliminarily validate the φ-Transformer architecture—with Lucas-scaled layer capacities—demonstrating that introducing hierarchy to transformers recovers the conservation law (efficiency = 2.76× ≈ e, product ≈ 1.15).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18315992
Primary Topic
Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The φ-Compression Law: Golden Ratio Optimization in Neural Architecture

Ursachi Andrei
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
article

The φ-Compression Law: Golden Ratio Optimization in Neural Architecture

Ursachi Andrei
article en

Abstract

We report a conservation law governing neural network compression: when layer widths follow golden ratio (φ ≈ 1.618) scaling via Lucas numbers, the product of efficiency gain and parameter retention equals unity: efficiency × retention = 1.0004 ≈ 1 Systematic experiments across 216 training runs and four neural network architectures reveal that φ-based (Lucas) scaling achieves 2.81 ± 0.07× parameter efficiency gains with 64.4 ± 0.9% parameter reduction in convolutional networks (SimpleCNN, ResNet-18, ConvNeXt-Tiny), while showing exactly no effect in Vision Transformers. The efficiency gain approaches Euler's number (e ≈ 2.718, 3.4% deviation) and the retention fraction approaches 1/e (≈ 0.368, 3.3% deviation), suggesting a deep connection between golden ratio architecture and information-theoretic optimality. The transformer null result is not a failure but a prediction: φ-scaling benefits hierarchical/cascaded processing, which CNNs possess inherently through width progression but standard transformers lack due to uniform layer structure. We propose and preliminarily validate the φ-Transformer architecture—with Lucas-scaled layer capacities—demonstrating that introducing hierarchy to transformers recovers the conservation law (efficiency = 2.76× ≈ e, product ≈ 1.15).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The φ-Compression Law: Golden Ratio Optimization in Neural Architecture — Ursachi Andrei · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS