Time to reframe osteoporosis: a position statement to characterize the osteoporosis care gap

Osteoporosis, a condition marked by increased fracture risk, remains under-diagnosed and under-treated worldwide, resulting in a substantial "treatment gap"-the difference between those eligible for osteoporosis treatment and those who actually receive it. While the concept of closing the treatment gap is commendable, and has galvanized clinical and policy efforts, this position statement argues that the prevailing narrative is in danger of becoming disease-focused and parentalistic, neglecting person-centered care. An international consensus group, including public contributors with lived experience were convened to define and characterize the "osteoporosis care gap" as a broader framework, encompassing deficits not only in pharmacological treatment but also in diagnosis, assessment, and multi-disciplinary management. The care gap is thus defined as "the discrepancy between the care provided to those at risk of osteoporotic fractures and best practice, person-centered care<i>.</i>" Multi-level determinants of the care gap are identified including: societal-low public awareness underpinned by unhelpful stereotypes, and prevalent health inequalities; health policy-insufficient prioritization, diagnostic confusion, and lack of incentivization; healthcare service-fragmented care pathways with unclear roles and poor communication, inadequate follow-up, and insufficient support for shared decision making; and individual-unmet needs for care which is person-centered, participatory, understandable, equitable, holistic and multidisciplinary, and respects autonomy. The statement calls for a person-centered, equitable, and multidisciplinary approach to osteoporosis care, integrating the perspectives and needs of patients, families, and caregiver. Actions needed at societal and policy level are described, including increasing public awareness, increasing health policy prioritization, with clear professional leadership. The components of osteoporosis care are described in terms of case finding, assessment, treatment, and review. Addressing this, care gap requires coordinated efforts from policymakers, healthcare services, and professionals, with a renewed focus on equity and patient values and preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBMR Plus
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag006
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time to reframe osteoporosis: a position statement to characterize the osteoporosis care gap

Z. Paskins, Robin Daly, Laurna Bullock, Fiona Blackman et al.
JBMR Plus
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Time to reframe osteoporosis: a position statement to characterize the osteoporosis care gap

Z. Paskins, Robin Daly, Laurna Bullock, Fiona Blackman, Emma Clark, Emily Lam, B. Hauser, Caroline B. Sangan, Janice McKinley, Wei Tian, M K Javaid, Elaine Nicholls, Ashley Hawarden, Corinne Turnbull, Chelsea Kettle, Terence O’Neill, Sarah Leyland, Ken Poole, D. Keith B. Armstrong, Ida Bentley, S. Ralston, Clare Jinks, Carmelinda Ruggerio, Deborah David, Opinder Sahota, Jill Griffin, Valerie Farr, Celia L Gregson, Kanta Sandhu, Nic Vine, Dan Flower, Rose Jones
article en

Abstract

Osteoporosis, a condition marked by increased fracture risk, remains under-diagnosed and under-treated worldwide, resulting in a substantial "treatment gap"-the difference between those eligible for osteoporosis treatment and those who actually receive it. While the concept of closing the treatment gap is commendable, and has galvanized clinical and policy efforts, this position statement argues that the prevailing narrative is in danger of becoming disease-focused and parentalistic, neglecting person-centered care. An international consensus group, including public contributors with lived experience were convened to define and characterize the "osteoporosis care gap" as a broader framework, encompassing deficits not only in pharmacological treatment but also in diagnosis, assessment, and multi-disciplinary management. The care gap is thus defined as "the discrepancy between the care provided to those at risk of osteoporotic fractures and best practice, person-centered care<i>.</i>" Multi-level determinants of the care gap are identified including: societal-low public awareness underpinned by unhelpful stereotypes, and prevalent health inequalities; health policy-insufficient prioritization, diagnostic confusion, and lack of incentivization; healthcare service-fragmented care pathways with unclear roles and poor communication, inadequate follow-up, and insufficient support for shared decision making; and individual-unmet needs for care which is person-centered, participatory, understandable, equitable, holistic and multidisciplinary, and respects autonomy. The statement calls for a person-centered, equitable, and multidisciplinary approach to osteoporosis care, integrating the perspectives and needs of patients, families, and caregiver. Actions needed at societal and policy level are described, including increasing public awareness, increasing health policy prioritization, with clear professional leadership. The components of osteoporosis care are described in terms of case finding, assessment, treatment, and review. Addressing this, care gap requires coordinated efforts from policymakers, healthcare services, and professionals, with a renewed focus on equity and patient values and preferences.

JBMR PlusVol. 10(3)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Ulster (GB), Deakin University (AU), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Perugia (IT), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Western General Hospital (GB), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), Altnagelvin Area Hospital (GB), Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB), University of Malaya (MY), University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Cambridge School (PT), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Western Health and Social Care Trust (GB), Bridge University (SS), Health Sciences and Nutrition (AU), Cambridge Quantum Computing (United Kingdom) (GB), Arthritis UK (GB), Solihull Hospital (GB), Royal Osteoporosis Society (GB), Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB), NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Plymouth Hospital (GB), University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (GB), Keele University (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.