Five Faces of Citational Injustice

This article explores the non-distributive conception of justice found in the work of feminist political philosopher Iris Marion Young (1949–2006), particularly in her landmark volume Justice and the Politics of Difference (1990). As laid out in that work, Young’s “five faces of oppression”—exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and violence—are central to the issues posed by citational justice scholarship and open up new ways of understanding how citational injustice is unjust. By connecting Young’s work with questions of citational justice, this article seeks to develop a nuanced conception of injustice as oppression, and thus as a matter of radical progressive politics, rather than merely a question of the (re)distribution of goods, which is too easily coopted to the capitalist logics of the corporatized university. The article concludes with some thoughts around reading and generative AI in academic work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18357/kula.298
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five Faces of Citational Injustice

Sam Popowich
KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

Five Faces of Citational Injustice

Sam Popowich
article en

Abstract

This article explores the non-distributive conception of justice found in the work of feminist political philosopher Iris Marion Young (1949–2006), particularly in her landmark volume Justice and the Politics of Difference (1990). As laid out in that work, Young’s “five faces of oppression”—exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and violence—are central to the issues posed by citational justice scholarship and open up new ways of understanding how citational injustice is unjust. By connecting Young’s work with questions of citational justice, this article seeks to develop a nuanced conception of injustice as oppression, and thus as a matter of radical progressive politics, rather than merely a question of the (re)distribution of goods, which is too easily coopted to the capitalist logics of the corporatized university. The article concludes with some thoughts around reading and generative AI in academic work.

KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studiesVol. 9(1)
The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.