UN Mandate Misalignment: Crisis and Context of MINUSMA in Mali

The United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA), established in 2013, represents one of the most complex and challenging peacekeeping operations in UN history. Despite its ambitious mandate to stabilise Mali, support peace agreements, protect civilians, and promote human rights, the mission concluded in 2023 without achieving many of its core objectives. In this article, I examine the critical misalignment between MINUSMA's mandate and the local context in Mali, focusing on the perspectives of Ghanaian peacekeepers who served on the frontlines. Drawing on organisational–environmental theory and Michael Lipsky's concept of street-level bureaucracy, the study reveals how flawed mandate assumptions, state-centric solutions and local engagement, and restrictions on proactive engagement contributed to the mission's operational challenges. Through qualitative interviews with 20 Ghanaian peacekeepers, the findings highlight a disconnect between policy design and on-the-ground realities, emphasising the need for contextually grounded, flexible, and inclusive mandates in future peacekeeping operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Africa Spectrum
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00020397251410960
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UN Mandate Misalignment: Crisis and Context of MINUSMA in Mali

Paa Kwesi Wolseley Prah
Africa Spectrum
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

UN Mandate Misalignment: Crisis and Context of MINUSMA in Mali

Paa Kwesi Wolseley Prah
article en

Abstract

The United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA), established in 2013, represents one of the most complex and challenging peacekeeping operations in UN history. Despite its ambitious mandate to stabilise Mali, support peace agreements, protect civilians, and promote human rights, the mission concluded in 2023 without achieving many of its core objectives. In this article, I examine the critical misalignment between MINUSMA's mandate and the local context in Mali, focusing on the perspectives of Ghanaian peacekeepers who served on the frontlines. Drawing on organisational–environmental theory and Michael Lipsky's concept of street-level bureaucracy, the study reveals how flawed mandate assumptions, state-centric solutions and local engagement, and restrictions on proactive engagement contributed to the mission's operational challenges. Through qualitative interviews with 20 Ghanaian peacekeepers, the findings highlight a disconnect between policy design and on-the-ground realities, emphasising the need for contextually grounded, flexible, and inclusive mandates in future peacekeeping operations.

Africa Spectrum
Lingnan University (HK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

UN Mandate Misalignment: Crisis and Context of MINUSMA in Mali — Paa Kwesi Wolseley Prah · Africa Spectrum (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS