Improving the transferability of SAR-derived vegetation indices for crop monitoring

• SAR enables frequent crop monitoring when optical data are limited by clouds • VH backscatter is the strongest SAR predictor for NDVI/EVI in corn–soybean • DAP and AGDD improve accuracy and cross-region transfer of SAR-derived VIs • Transferability drops in dry/subtropical zones due to moisture and biotic stress Optical vegetation indices (VIs) are widely used for crop monitoring, yet their operational value is often limited by cloud contamination and data gaps. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) provides cloud-independent observations and is sensitive to crop structure, offering a pathway to estimate VIs when optical imagery is unavailable. A key challenge, however, is the transferability of SAR-based VI models across regions and seasons due to environmental and climatic differences. Here, we evaluated whether incorporating time-related proxies of crop growth such as accumulated growing degree days (AGDD) and days after planting (DAP), together with environmental variables can improve the transferability of SAR-estimated VIs across major U.S. corn and soybean production regions. Using dense Sentinel-1 SAR with Harmonized Landsat–Sentinel (HLS) reference data, we trained LightGBM regression models under multiple predictor configurations. Across climate zones, adding time-related features consistently improved generalization relative to SAR-only baselines, with DAP providing the most robust performance. For NDVI, the DAP-based model achieved MAE values ranging from 0.083 to 0.115 and R² scores between 0.422 and 0.781. For EVI, the model achieved MAE values ranging from 0.081 to 0.111 and R² scores between 0.388 and 0.721. Performance peaked in humid continental zones (Dfa/Dfb) but declined in semi-arid (BSk) and subtropical zones (Cfa), where unaccounted moisture and biotic stressors limited spatial transferability. This study offers insights into developing a scalable framework that ensures high-frequency crop monitoring across diverse geographies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2026.101411
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the transferability of SAR-derived vegetation indices for crop monitoring

Mir Md Tasnim Alam, Henry Poku Osei, Anita Simic Milas
Environmental Challenges
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Improving the transferability of SAR-derived vegetation indices for crop monitoring

Mir Md Tasnim Alam, Henry Poku Osei, Anita Simic Milas
article en

Abstract

• SAR enables frequent crop monitoring when optical data are limited by clouds • VH backscatter is the strongest SAR predictor for NDVI/EVI in corn–soybean • DAP and AGDD improve accuracy and cross-region transfer of SAR-derived VIs • Transferability drops in dry/subtropical zones due to moisture and biotic stress Optical vegetation indices (VIs) are widely used for crop monitoring, yet their operational value is often limited by cloud contamination and data gaps. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) provides cloud-independent observations and is sensitive to crop structure, offering a pathway to estimate VIs when optical imagery is unavailable. A key challenge, however, is the transferability of SAR-based VI models across regions and seasons due to environmental and climatic differences. Here, we evaluated whether incorporating time-related proxies of crop growth such as accumulated growing degree days (AGDD) and days after planting (DAP), together with environmental variables can improve the transferability of SAR-estimated VIs across major U.S. corn and soybean production regions. Using dense Sentinel-1 SAR with Harmonized Landsat–Sentinel (HLS) reference data, we trained LightGBM regression models under multiple predictor configurations. Across climate zones, adding time-related features consistently improved generalization relative to SAR-only baselines, with DAP providing the most robust performance. For NDVI, the DAP-based model achieved MAE values ranging from 0.083 to 0.115 and R² scores between 0.422 and 0.781. For EVI, the model achieved MAE values ranging from 0.081 to 0.111 and R² scores between 0.388 and 0.721. Performance peaked in humid continental zones (Dfa/Dfb) but declined in semi-arid (BSk) and subtropical zones (Cfa), where unaccounted moisture and biotic stressors limited spatial transferability. This study offers insights into developing a scalable framework that ensures high-frequency crop monitoring across diverse geographies.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 22
Bowling Green State University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving the transferability of SAR-derived vegetation indices for crop monitoring — Mir Md Tasnim Alam, Henry Poku Osei, et al. · Environmental Challenges (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS