Experimental study on axial compression performance of mortise-and-tenon precast concrete beam–column joints

Mortise-and-tenon precast concrete (MTPC) beam–column joints utilize a mortise–tenon structure with longitudinal prestressing to secure their connections. This approach offers advantages such as dry construction, easy assembly, a short construction period, and the possibility of disassembly. To meet the “strong joint” requirement, this study enhances the core areas of the joints through ultra-high–performance concrete (UHPC) reinforcement and rebar enhancement. First, the structure and assembly method for MTPC joints are introduced. Subsequently, five distinct specimens are fabricated for testing: two UHPC-reinforced models, one rebar-enhanced model, one standard MTPC joint model, and one cast-in-place joint model. All specimens are then subjected to monotonic axial compression tests. The results show that the optimized MTPC joints exhibit significantly improved axial compressive strength, reaching 90% to 100% of the capacity of the cast-in-place joint. With regard to the optimization methods, whereas increasing rebar ratios enhances axial strength, it does not fully achieve the “strong joint” criterion. By contrast, UHPC reinforcement significantly boosts axial compressive capacity, achieving the desired “strong joint” standard. After axial load is used to compact the assembly gaps in MTPC joints, the overall integrity is made strong, axial stiffness remains stable, and the load transfer path becomes clear. With UHPC reinforcement, force transmission through the MTPC joint components becomes more reliable, with the tenon bearing more axial load; however, the tenon should not be used as the main vertical force transmission section. Finally, it is found that the axial compressive load capacity calculation method recommended by the Chinese code can accurately and safely predict the axial compressive load capacities of MTPC joints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Structural Engineering
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332261415707
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental study on axial compression performance of mortise-and-tenon precast concrete beam–column joints

Wenxue Zhang, Lijun Su, Cheng Zhang, Junwei Wang
Advances in Structural Engineering
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

Experimental study on axial compression performance of mortise-and-tenon precast concrete beam–column joints

Wenxue Zhang, Lijun Su, Cheng Zhang, Junwei Wang
article en

Abstract

Mortise-and-tenon precast concrete (MTPC) beam–column joints utilize a mortise–tenon structure with longitudinal prestressing to secure their connections. This approach offers advantages such as dry construction, easy assembly, a short construction period, and the possibility of disassembly. To meet the “strong joint” requirement, this study enhances the core areas of the joints through ultra-high–performance concrete (UHPC) reinforcement and rebar enhancement. First, the structure and assembly method for MTPC joints are introduced. Subsequently, five distinct specimens are fabricated for testing: two UHPC-reinforced models, one rebar-enhanced model, one standard MTPC joint model, and one cast-in-place joint model. All specimens are then subjected to monotonic axial compression tests. The results show that the optimized MTPC joints exhibit significantly improved axial compressive strength, reaching 90% to 100% of the capacity of the cast-in-place joint. With regard to the optimization methods, whereas increasing rebar ratios enhances axial strength, it does not fully achieve the “strong joint” criterion. By contrast, UHPC reinforcement significantly boosts axial compressive capacity, achieving the desired “strong joint” standard. After axial load is used to compact the assembly gaps in MTPC joints, the overall integrity is made strong, axial stiffness remains stable, and the load transfer path becomes clear. With UHPC reinforcement, force transmission through the MTPC joint components becomes more reliable, with the tenon bearing more axial load; however, the tenon should not be used as the main vertical force transmission section. Finally, it is found that the axial compressive load capacity calculation method recommended by the Chinese code can accurately and safely predict the axial compressive load capacities of MTPC joints.

Advances in Structural Engineering
North China University of Technology (CN), Beijing University of Technology (CN), Beijing Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute (China) (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.