1340–1345: Ibn Qayyim al-Ǧawziyya on the Question of Permanent Truce

This article analyses Ibn Qayyim al-Ǧawziyya’s discussion of permanent truce (al-hudna al-muṭlaqa) in his “Legal Judgements about the People of Protected Status” (Aḥkām ahl al-ḏimma). Focusing on Ibn al-Qayyim’s method and arguments, the article examines the content of a relevant section from the work, situating it within the broader discussion of “truce” in the Sunnī legal tradition. Ibn al-Qayyim manages to ground permanent truce in the Prophetic tradition. Both his argument and its justification do not conform to anything we find in Sunnī law, including Ibn al-Qayyim’s own Ḥanbalī school. The article thus underscores the creativity and dynamism of Islamic jurists who often think outside the box, even in instances where they agree with their predecessors, let alone cases where they disagree. The article also points out a major inaccuracy in modern research about truce in Islamic law, i.e. the claim that the latter does not allow for a truce to exceed ten years.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College)
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/tmh/2026.8.1.99
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1340–1345: Ibn Qayyim al-Ǧawziyya on the Question of Permanent Truce

Suleiman Ali Mourad
Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College)
Islamic Studies and History
article

1340–1345: Ibn Qayyim al-Ǧawziyya on the Question of Permanent Truce

Suleiman Ali Mourad
article en

Abstract

This article analyses Ibn Qayyim al-Ǧawziyya’s discussion of permanent truce (al-hudna al-muṭlaqa) in his “Legal Judgements about the People of Protected Status” (Aḥkām ahl al-ḏimma). Focusing on Ibn al-Qayyim’s method and arguments, the article examines the content of a relevant section from the work, situating it within the broader discussion of “truce” in the Sunnī legal tradition. Ibn al-Qayyim manages to ground permanent truce in the Prophetic tradition. Both his argument and its justification do not conform to anything we find in Sunnī law, including Ibn al-Qayyim’s own Ḥanbalī school. The article thus underscores the creativity and dynamism of Islamic jurists who often think outside the box, even in instances where they agree with their predecessors, let alone cases where they disagree. The article also points out a major inaccuracy in modern research about truce in Islamic law, i.e. the claim that the latter does not allow for a truce to exceed ten years.

Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.