Are men aware of normal penile length and sexual function? A narrative review of the literature

Men frequently present to their health practitioners with concerns that they are not "normal" in the domains of sexual anatomy and function. This narrative review aims to synthesize the existing evidence on the general male population's perception of normative sexual anatomy (penile length) and function (erectile and ejaculatory function). A structured literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, limited to English language studies that involved adult participants from non-medical backgrounds. Of the 1098 studies identified, only seven met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, indicating an insufficiency in research directly addressing men's perceptions of normative sexual anatomy and function. The studies included in this review found that there was an inaccurate understanding of what empirically constitutes "normal". Men considered above-average penis lengths to be common and perceived themselves as "small" despite being within the normal range. They tended to overestimate typical intercourse durations and were inaccurate in self-diagnosing ejaculatory dysfunction and erectile dysfunction. The inability to differentiate normal and abnormal sexual function reflects a poor understanding of what constitutes normal. These findings may inform future research and provide guidance for educating clinicians and the public to improve sexual health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Andrology
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202572
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are men aware of normal penile length and sexual function? A narrative review of the literature

Glenn Duns, Kathryn Schubach, Darren Katz, Winston Wu et al.
Asian Journal of Andrology
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Are men aware of normal penile length and sexual function? A narrative review of the literature

Glenn Duns, Kathryn Schubach, Darren Katz, Winston Wu, Vincent Chan, Yoonus Faizal
article en

Abstract

Men frequently present to their health practitioners with concerns that they are not "normal" in the domains of sexual anatomy and function. This narrative review aims to synthesize the existing evidence on the general male population's perception of normative sexual anatomy (penile length) and function (erectile and ejaculatory function). A structured literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, limited to English language studies that involved adult participants from non-medical backgrounds. Of the 1098 studies identified, only seven met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, indicating an insufficiency in research directly addressing men's perceptions of normative sexual anatomy and function. The studies included in this review found that there was an inaccurate understanding of what empirically constitutes "normal". Men considered above-average penis lengths to be common and perceived themselves as "small" despite being within the normal range. They tended to overestimate typical intercourse durations and were inaccurate in self-diagnosing ejaculatory dysfunction and erectile dysfunction. The inability to differentiate normal and abnormal sexual function reflects a poor understanding of what constitutes normal. These findings may inform future research and provide guidance for educating clinicians and the public to improve sexual health.

Asian Journal of Andrology
Eastern Health (AU), Western Health (AU), Melbourne Health (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are men aware of normal penile length and sexual function? A narrative review of the literature — Glenn Duns, Kathryn Schubach, et al. · Asian Journal of Andrology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS