Dietary Patterns During Weight Loss Maintenance vs. Weight Regain: A Secondary Analysis of the Look AHEAD Trial

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Limited information exists on how dietary patterns change in adults who experience weight regain vs. those who maintain weight loss after lifestyle interventions. <b>Methods</b>: Five hundred fifty-two adults (60 ± 1.0 years, 33.8 ± 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) with type 2 diabetes mellitus from the Look AHEAD Trial achieved ≥ 7% weight loss after Year 1, completed follow-up visits through Year 4, and provided three 134-item food frequency questionnaires. Weight "regain" (WLR) was defined as regaining ≥ 50% of the initial weight lost. Dietary patterns were determined using established DASH diet scores (scale: 0-9) and principal component analysis (PCA; higher scores = more adherent). Repeated measures linear mixed models assessed group and sex differences in dietary patterns. <b>Results</b>: Dietary patterns were similar between groups during weight loss (baseline to Year 1). WLR DASH scores decreased more from Year 1 to Year 4 compared to "maintain" (WLM) (WLR: Y1: 5.66 ± 0.14, Y4: 4.60 ± 0.14; WLM: Y1: 5.49 ± 0.13, Y4: 4.92 ± 0.13; difference-<i>p</i> < 0.01). Of the two PCA-derived dietary patterns, Pattern 1 (vegetable, fruit, and fish) decreased more in WLR (WLR: Y1: 0.12 ± 0.16, Y4: -0.14 ± 0.16, WLM: Y1: 0.06 ± 0.14, Y4: 0.25 ± 0.15; difference-<i>p</i> < 0.01), while Pattern 2 (low-fiber grains and high-fat animal proteins) increased in WLR (WLR: Y1: 0.40 ± 0.11, Y4: 0.61 ± 0.11, WLM: Y1: 0.34 ± 0.10, Y4: 0.21 ± 0.10, difference-<i>p</i> < 0.01). Sex differences showed that only WLR women and WLM men increased sweets from Y1 to Y4 (WLR women Y1: 0.26 ± 0.04, Y4: 0.41 ± 0.04; <i>p</i> < 0.01; WLM men: Y1: 0.23 ± 0.04, Y4: 0.38 ± 0.04; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: These data demonstrate that differences in dietary patterns between WLR and WLM emerge after the initial weight loss intervention with some sex differences. This suggests that longer-term shifts in dietary patterns after lifestyle interventions may influence weight loss maintenance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020327
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dietary Patterns During Weight Loss Maintenance vs. Weight Regain: A Secondary Analysis of the Look AHEAD Trial

Mary C. Prater, Ursula White, Frank L. Greenway
Nutrients
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Dietary Patterns During Weight Loss Maintenance vs. Weight Regain: A Secondary Analysis of the Look AHEAD Trial

Mary C. Prater, Ursula White, Frank L. Greenway
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Limited information exists on how dietary patterns change in adults who experience weight regain vs. those who maintain weight loss after lifestyle interventions. <b>Methods</b>: Five hundred fifty-two adults (60 ± 1.0 years, 33.8 ± 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) with type 2 diabetes mellitus from the Look AHEAD Trial achieved ≥ 7% weight loss after Year 1, completed follow-up visits through Year 4, and provided three 134-item food frequency questionnaires. Weight "regain" (WLR) was defined as regaining ≥ 50% of the initial weight lost. Dietary patterns were determined using established DASH diet scores (scale: 0-9) and principal component analysis (PCA; higher scores = more adherent). Repeated measures linear mixed models assessed group and sex differences in dietary patterns. <b>Results</b>: Dietary patterns were similar between groups during weight loss (baseline to Year 1). WLR DASH scores decreased more from Year 1 to Year 4 compared to "maintain" (WLM) (WLR: Y1: 5.66 ± 0.14, Y4: 4.60 ± 0.14; WLM: Y1: 5.49 ± 0.13, Y4: 4.92 ± 0.13; difference-<i>p</i> < 0.01). Of the two PCA-derived dietary patterns, Pattern 1 (vegetable, fruit, and fish) decreased more in WLR (WLR: Y1: 0.12 ± 0.16, Y4: -0.14 ± 0.16, WLM: Y1: 0.06 ± 0.14, Y4: 0.25 ± 0.15; difference-<i>p</i> < 0.01), while Pattern 2 (low-fiber grains and high-fat animal proteins) increased in WLR (WLR: Y1: 0.40 ± 0.11, Y4: 0.61 ± 0.11, WLM: Y1: 0.34 ± 0.10, Y4: 0.21 ± 0.10, difference-<i>p</i> < 0.01). Sex differences showed that only WLR women and WLM men increased sweets from Y1 to Y4 (WLR women Y1: 0.26 ± 0.04, Y4: 0.41 ± 0.04; <i>p</i> < 0.01; WLM men: Y1: 0.23 ± 0.04, Y4: 0.38 ± 0.04; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: These data demonstrate that differences in dietary patterns between WLR and WLM emerge after the initial weight loss intervention with some sex differences. This suggests that longer-term shifts in dietary patterns after lifestyle interventions may influence weight loss maintenance.

NutrientsVol. 18(2)
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.