Learning a ranking based on multiple reference profiles preference model with a simulated annealing metaheuristic

Abstract Multiple criteria decision aiding helps decision‐makers (DMs) to reach better decisions in multi‐criteria problems using preference models, whose parameters are elicited to best correspond to the preferences of the DM using, among other things, holistic judgments. Regarding the elicitation of the Reference based on Multiple reference Profiles (RMP) model, the literature only contains an exact method based on a Boolean satisfiability formulation, while a mixed‐integer linear program and evolutionary metaheuristics focus on a more simpler version of the model (SRMP). Exact methods for preference elicitation usually struggle to solve cases with many criteria and a lot of preference information, while metaheuristics have a gap to optimal solutions. To address these two issues, we propose in this article a simulated annealing based metaheuristic to elicit an RMP model. In order to evaluate the performance of this method, we conducted numerical experiments on simulated instances. To this end, we developed a way to uniformly generate a weak‐order extension on the subsets of criteria, which allows us to create random DMs consistent with the RMP model. The results of these experiments show that the proposed method is able to solve at optimality big instances, as well as being closer to optimal solutions than other metaheuristics in SRMP elicitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Transactions in Operational Research
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.70159
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning a ranking based on multiple reference profiles preference model with a simulated annealing metaheuristic

Yann Jourdin, Alexandru‐Liviu Olteanu, Arwa Khannoussi, Patrick Meyer
International Transactions in Operational Research
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Learning a ranking based on multiple reference profiles preference model with a simulated annealing metaheuristic

Yann Jourdin, Alexandru‐Liviu Olteanu, Arwa Khannoussi, Patrick Meyer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Multiple criteria decision aiding helps decision‐makers (DMs) to reach better decisions in multi‐criteria problems using preference models, whose parameters are elicited to best correspond to the preferences of the DM using, among other things, holistic judgments. Regarding the elicitation of the Reference based on Multiple reference Profiles (RMP) model, the literature only contains an exact method based on a Boolean satisfiability formulation, while a mixed‐integer linear program and evolutionary metaheuristics focus on a more simpler version of the model (SRMP). Exact methods for preference elicitation usually struggle to solve cases with many criteria and a lot of preference information, while metaheuristics have a gap to optimal solutions. To address these two issues, we propose in this article a simulated annealing based metaheuristic to elicit an RMP model. In order to evaluate the performance of this method, we conducted numerical experiments on simulated instances. To this end, we developed a way to uniformly generate a weak‐order extension on the subsets of criteria, which allows us to create random DMs consistent with the RMP model. The results of these experiments show that the proposed method is able to solve at optimality big instances, as well as being closer to optimal solutions than other metaheuristics in SRMP elicitation.

International Transactions in Operational Research
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bretagne Sud (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences et Techniques de l’Information de la Communication et de la Connaissance (FR), IMT Atlantique (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.