Greater good from a distance: how psychological distance shapes utilitarian behavior

This research explores whether utilitarianism and deontology can be understood within the Construal Level Theory framework. We explore whether utilitarianism (vs. deontology), focused on the “greater good for the greatest number” as its objective, aligns with a high (vs. low) level of construal, focused on primary features and the goal of an event. We conducted an experimental study (N = 890) in which the level of construal was manipulated through social distance (high vs. low). Then measured the reported probability of participants taking utilitarian actions in three moral dilemmas and their perception of morality and appropriateness of the act itself. Although our manipulation did not affect the likelihood of taking action, a high construal level led to a more positive evaluation of morality and appropriateness of taking action. These findings add new knowledge to the role of construal level in influencing moral decision-making and moral judgments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics & Behavior
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2026.2617867
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greater good from a distance: how psychological distance shapes utilitarian behavior

Valerio Pellegrini, Valeria De Cristofaro, Mauro Giacomantonio, Matteo Bonora et al.
Ethics & Behavior
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

Greater good from a distance: how psychological distance shapes utilitarian behavior

Valerio Pellegrini, Valeria De Cristofaro, Mauro Giacomantonio, Matteo Bonora, Luigi Leone
article en

Abstract

This research explores whether utilitarianism and deontology can be understood within the Construal Level Theory framework. We explore whether utilitarianism (vs. deontology), focused on the “greater good for the greatest number” as its objective, aligns with a high (vs. low) level of construal, focused on primary features and the goal of an event. We conducted an experimental study (N = 890) in which the level of construal was manipulated through social distance (high vs. low). Then measured the reported probability of participants taking utilitarian actions in three moral dilemmas and their perception of morality and appropriateness of the act itself. Although our manipulation did not affect the likelihood of taking action, a high construal level led to a more positive evaluation of morality and appropriateness of taking action. These findings add new knowledge to the role of construal level in influencing moral decision-making and moral judgments.

Ethics & Behavior
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Greater good from a distance: how psychological distance shapes utilitarian behavior — Valerio Pellegrini, Valeria De Cristofaro, et al. · Ethics & Behavior (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS