Flow conditions govern the efficiency of passive environmental DNA sampling

Effective aquatic biomonitoring requires understanding how flow conditions influence the efficiency of environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, particularly where conventional filtration is slow or impractical. Passive eDNA samplers (PEDS), which accumulate DNA on submerged substrates, offer a low-effort alternative, yet their performance across flow conditions remains poorly quantified. Guided by a flow-adsorption framework, we combined controlled flume experiments with field comparisons to test how flow affects passive eDNA capture. In flumes, glass fiber (GF) membranes accumulated eDNA rapidly and surpassed a 2 L filtration benchmark within 30 min at high velocity, as measured by droplet digital PCR. In field deployments across 21 lentic and lotic sites, metabarcoding showed that GF achieved the highest amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness, outperforming filtration in running waters and equalling it in still waters. Together, these findings indicate that water movement enhances passive adsorption and that short immersions can suffice in swift rivers, whereas longer soaks are needed in lakes. GF-based PEDS are therefore a robust, low-effort, and scalable approach for standardized aquatic biodiversity monitoring, particularly in lotic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment International
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2026.110086
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flow conditions govern the efficiency of passive environmental DNA sampling

Junhao Huang, Jianshuo Qian, Y. Li, Liuyong Ding et al.
Environment International
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Flow conditions govern the efficiency of passive environmental DNA sampling

Junhao Huang, Jianshuo Qian, Y. Li, Liuyong Ding, Jinnan Chen, Yanfeng He
article en

Abstract

Effective aquatic biomonitoring requires understanding how flow conditions influence the efficiency of environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, particularly where conventional filtration is slow or impractical. Passive eDNA samplers (PEDS), which accumulate DNA on submerged substrates, offer a low-effort alternative, yet their performance across flow conditions remains poorly quantified. Guided by a flow-adsorption framework, we combined controlled flume experiments with field comparisons to test how flow affects passive eDNA capture. In flumes, glass fiber (GF) membranes accumulated eDNA rapidly and surpassed a 2 L filtration benchmark within 30 min at high velocity, as measured by droplet digital PCR. In field deployments across 21 lentic and lotic sites, metabarcoding showed that GF achieved the highest amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness, outperforming filtration in running waters and equalling it in still waters. Together, these findings indicate that water movement enhances passive adsorption and that short immersions can suffice in swift rivers, whereas longer soaks are needed in lakes. GF-based PEDS are therefore a robust, low-effort, and scalable approach for standardized aquatic biodiversity monitoring, particularly in lotic systems.

Environment InternationalVol. 208
Institute of Hydrobiology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.