Reliability and Validity of the Brief Remote Elkins Alldredge Test of Hypnotizability (BREATH) in a College Student Population

This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Brief Remote Elkins Alldredge Test of Hypnotizability (BREATH). The BREATH is a brief adaptation of the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale (EHS) based on prior confirmatory factor analysis of the EHS. One hundred college students at Baylor University's department of psychology and neuroscience were recruited for this study. Hypnotizability levels were normally distributed across participants for both scales. The BREATH had a significant correlation with the EHS-CF (rs = .505, <i>p</i> < .001), and good internal consistency. Therefore, there is empirical evidence that supports the reliability and validity of the BREATH, affirming its utility for digital assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2025.2594995
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Validity of the Brief Remote Elkins Alldredge Test of Hypnotizability (BREATH) in a College Student Population

Cameron T. Alldredge, Gary Elkins, Vanessa Muñiz
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
article

Reliability and Validity of the Brief Remote Elkins Alldredge Test of Hypnotizability (BREATH) in a College Student Population

Cameron T. Alldredge, Gary Elkins, Vanessa Muñiz
article en

Abstract

This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Brief Remote Elkins Alldredge Test of Hypnotizability (BREATH). The BREATH is a brief adaptation of the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale (EHS) based on prior confirmatory factor analysis of the EHS. One hundred college students at Baylor University's department of psychology and neuroscience were recruited for this study. Hypnotizability levels were normally distributed across participants for both scales. The BREATH had a significant correlation with the EHS-CF (rs = .505, <i>p</i> < .001), and good internal consistency. Therefore, there is empirical evidence that supports the reliability and validity of the BREATH, affirming its utility for digital assessment.

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Baylor University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.