Urban–rural disparities in household carbon footprints in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Abstract Households are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions; however, spatial disparities in household carbon footprints (CFPs) remain underexplored in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study presents the first comprehensive comparison of household CFPs between urban and rural settings in Sri Lanka. A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1569 households in the Colombo District using stratified multi-stage cluster sampling. Households with at least two adults and one child under 18 years were included. Data on household energy use, food and beverage consumption, travel, goods and services, and housing (including waste generation and water use) were collected using a validated tool adapted for Sri Lankan households and verified against utility records. Urban households (n = 1205) reported significantly higher mean CFPs than rural households (3515.6 vs. 2766.8 kgCO₂e; p = 0.001). Energy use was the largest contributor to CFPs in urban areas (mean = 1049.7 kgCO₂e), whereas travel dominated in rural households (mean = 834.7 kgCO₂e). Within these domains, urban households generated significantly higher emissions from electricity use (747.6 vs. 371.1 kgCO₂e), waste disposal (456.4 vs. 227.4 kgCO₂e), water consumption (51.3 vs. 26.9 kgCO₂e), and milk intake (276.4 vs. 164.8 kg CO₂e) compared to rural households. On a per-capita basis, emissions were 27% higher in urban than in rural areas (1010.1 vs. 794.9 kg CO₂e; p = 0.003). These findings highlight the importance of addressing behavioural diversity between urban and rural populations in climate mitigation. Urban policies should prioritize household energy efficiency, sustainable consumption, and improved waste management, whereas rural strategies should focus on expanding access to clean cooking fuels and low-emission transport options. By providing evidence from a South Asian LMIC, this study adds to the limited global literature on household-level emission disparities and informs the design of equitable, context-specific climate mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Environment
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-026-00516-7
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban–rural disparities in household carbon footprints in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Kasuni Chamila Kalubowila, Carukshi Arambepola
Discover Environment
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Urban–rural disparities in household carbon footprints in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Kasuni Chamila Kalubowila, Carukshi Arambepola
article en

Abstract

Abstract Households are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions; however, spatial disparities in household carbon footprints (CFPs) remain underexplored in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study presents the first comprehensive comparison of household CFPs between urban and rural settings in Sri Lanka. A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1569 households in the Colombo District using stratified multi-stage cluster sampling. Households with at least two adults and one child under 18 years were included. Data on household energy use, food and beverage consumption, travel, goods and services, and housing (including waste generation and water use) were collected using a validated tool adapted for Sri Lankan households and verified against utility records. Urban households (n = 1205) reported significantly higher mean CFPs than rural households (3515.6 vs. 2766.8 kgCO₂e; p = 0.001). Energy use was the largest contributor to CFPs in urban areas (mean = 1049.7 kgCO₂e), whereas travel dominated in rural households (mean = 834.7 kgCO₂e). Within these domains, urban households generated significantly higher emissions from electricity use (747.6 vs. 371.1 kgCO₂e), waste disposal (456.4 vs. 227.4 kgCO₂e), water consumption (51.3 vs. 26.9 kgCO₂e), and milk intake (276.4 vs. 164.8 kg CO₂e) compared to rural households. On a per-capita basis, emissions were 27% higher in urban than in rural areas (1010.1 vs. 794.9 kg CO₂e; p = 0.003). These findings highlight the importance of addressing behavioural diversity between urban and rural populations in climate mitigation. Urban policies should prioritize household energy efficiency, sustainable consumption, and improved waste management, whereas rural strategies should focus on expanding access to clean cooking fuels and low-emission transport options. By providing evidence from a South Asian LMIC, this study adds to the limited global literature on household-level emission disparities and informs the design of equitable, context-specific climate mitigation strategies.

Discover EnvironmentVol. 4(1)
University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Colombo (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.