Translating the One Security Framework for Global Sustainability: From Concept to Operational Model

Fragmented, sector-by-sector governance is poorly suited to cascading risks that couple climate, food, water, health, biodiversity, soils, energy, and environmental quality. This paper addresses the translation gap between integrative security–sustainability paradigms and the routine machinery of government, including planning, budgeting, procurement, and accountability. We develop the Spheres of Security (SOS) model as a conceptual–operational method organised around four overlapping spheres (biophysical, economic, social, and governance) and a repeatable cycle—diagnose → co-design → deliver → demonstrate → adapt—illustrated through two stylised vignettes (urban heat and health; watershed food–water–energy). SOS introduces an auditable overlap rule and an Overlap Score, supported by lean assurance, to make verified multi-sphere co-benefits commissionable and to surface trade-offs transparently within normal, accountable institutions (consistent with weak securitisation). We provide implementation guidance, including minimum institutional preconditions and staged entry-point options for jurisdictions where pooled budgets and full administrative integration are not immediately feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021031
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating the One Security Framework for Global Sustainability: From Concept to Operational Model

Minhyung Park
Sustainability
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Translating the One Security Framework for Global Sustainability: From Concept to Operational Model

Minhyung Park
article en

Abstract

Fragmented, sector-by-sector governance is poorly suited to cascading risks that couple climate, food, water, health, biodiversity, soils, energy, and environmental quality. This paper addresses the translation gap between integrative security–sustainability paradigms and the routine machinery of government, including planning, budgeting, procurement, and accountability. We develop the Spheres of Security (SOS) model as a conceptual–operational method organised around four overlapping spheres (biophysical, economic, social, and governance) and a repeatable cycle—diagnose → co-design → deliver → demonstrate → adapt—illustrated through two stylised vignettes (urban heat and health; watershed food–water–energy). SOS introduces an auditable overlap rule and an Overlap Score, supported by lean assurance, to make verified multi-sphere co-benefits commissionable and to surface trade-offs transparently within normal, accountable institutions (consistent with weak securitisation). We provide implementation guidance, including minimum institutional preconditions and staged entry-point options for jurisdictions where pooled budgets and full administrative integration are not immediately feasible.

SustainabilityVol. 18(2)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.