Identifying ecological restoration zones based on ecological security patterns in a resource transitioning district

Resource-based cities frequently encounter ecological problems such as landscape fragmentation and environmental degradation, necessitating systematic ecological restoration. Previous studies have often focused on single-factor restoration or on constructing ecological security pattern (ESP) in isolation, lacking integrated frameworks that couple spatial pattern analysis with restoration zoning in mining-affected urban areas. This study proposes an integrated framework of "assessment-pattern-zoning" and applies it to Tongshan District, Xuzhou City-a typical resource-transitioning city in China. The ecosystem services in 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2022 were assessed by the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model. Following the "source-resistance-corridor" paradigm, this study constructed the ESP and developed a zoning index to delineate ecological zones. The results indicate that: (1) Ecosystem services of Tongshan District displayed strong spatial heterogeneity, with the mean value exhibiting an "N"-shaped trend and a marked decline in 2010; (2) The ESP comprised 126.6 km² of ecological sources, 592.31 km of ecological corridors, 57 ecological pinch points, 21 ecological barrier points, and 222 ecological breakpoints, mainly concentrated in the northeast and central regions; (3) Tongshan District was divided into ecological restoration zone, warning zone, buffer zone, and conservation zone. The buffer zone covered the largest area (1,001.44 km², 53.91%), while most conservation zone (31.08%) overlapped with the ecological protection red line. Warning and restoration zones were concentrated in subsidence-affected areas. These findings offer practical insights for spatial planning and restoration in resource-based cities undergoing industrial transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36110-3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying ecological restoration zones based on ecological security patterns in a resource transitioning district

Jiakun Teng, Hu Yang, Yuqing Gu, Zhu Bin et al.
Scientific Reports
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Identifying ecological restoration zones based on ecological security patterns in a resource transitioning district

Jiakun Teng, Hu Yang, Yuqing Gu, Zhu Bin, Hui Ci, Ran Wang, Yahua Wang, Yuan Yuan, Jianhua Chen, Yun Ma, Yingying Zhu
article en

Abstract

Resource-based cities frequently encounter ecological problems such as landscape fragmentation and environmental degradation, necessitating systematic ecological restoration. Previous studies have often focused on single-factor restoration or on constructing ecological security pattern (ESP) in isolation, lacking integrated frameworks that couple spatial pattern analysis with restoration zoning in mining-affected urban areas. This study proposes an integrated framework of "assessment-pattern-zoning" and applies it to Tongshan District, Xuzhou City-a typical resource-transitioning city in China. The ecosystem services in 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2022 were assessed by the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model. Following the "source-resistance-corridor" paradigm, this study constructed the ESP and developed a zoning index to delineate ecological zones. The results indicate that: (1) Ecosystem services of Tongshan District displayed strong spatial heterogeneity, with the mean value exhibiting an "N"-shaped trend and a marked decline in 2010; (2) The ESP comprised 126.6 km² of ecological sources, 592.31 km of ecological corridors, 57 ecological pinch points, 21 ecological barrier points, and 222 ecological breakpoints, mainly concentrated in the northeast and central regions; (3) Tongshan District was divided into ecological restoration zone, warning zone, buffer zone, and conservation zone. The buffer zone covered the largest area (1,001.44 km², 53.91%), while most conservation zone (31.08%) overlapped with the ecological protection red line. Warning and restoration zones were concentrated in subsidence-affected areas. These findings offer practical insights for spatial planning and restoration in resource-based cities undergoing industrial transformation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Xuzhou University of Technology (CN), Nanjing Normal University (CN), Hohai University (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Nanjing University of Industry Technology (CN), Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Xuzhou (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.