Carbon emission model and evaluation analysis of vehicle waste tire different recycling processes based on reducing environmental pollution

To scientifically assess and quantitatively evaluate the carbon emissions associated with different treatment methods and processes for end-of-life vehicle tires, the carbon emission factor method was employed. Carbon emission models and carbon emission-reduction inventories were developed for the tire production, transportation, use, and recycling stages. Specifically, models and inventories were constructed for four treatment methods: Tire retreading, reclaimed rubber production, reclaimed rubber powder production, and pyrolysis, encompassing eight distinct processes: Hot retreading, cold retreading, atmospheric continuous desulfurization, screw extrusion, ambient grinding, cryogenic grinding, atmospheric pyrolysis, and vacuum pyrolysis. The carbon emissions, carbon reduction, net carbon surplus, and carbon reduction rate for each treatment method and process were calculated. Furthermore, sensitivity and economic analyses were conducted on the material mass and energy consumption in the production stage, which impact the total carbon emissions. The results indicate that among the four recycling methods, tire retreading production demonstrates the highest carbon reduction efficiency, followed by reclaimed rubber and reclaimed rubber powder production, while pyrolysis shows the lowest efficiency. Among the eight processes, cold retreading exhibits the most significant carbon reduction effect, with a carbon reduction rate of 59.30%. The ranking of carbon reduction efficiency is as follows: Cold Retreading > Hot Retreading > Ambient Grinding > Atmospheric Continuous Desulfurization > Screw Extrusion >Atmospheric Pyrolysis > Vacuum Pyrolysis > Cryogenic Grinding. Sensitivity analysis reveals a positive correlation between the material mass and energy consumption required in the production stage and the total carbon emissions; however, the impact of material mass on total carbon emissions is significantly greater than that of energy consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35688-y
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon emission model and evaluation analysis of vehicle waste tire different recycling processes based on reducing environmental pollution

Ao Li, Qiang Wang
Scientific Reports
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
article

Carbon emission model and evaluation analysis of vehicle waste tire different recycling processes based on reducing environmental pollution

Ao Li, Qiang Wang
article en

Abstract

To scientifically assess and quantitatively evaluate the carbon emissions associated with different treatment methods and processes for end-of-life vehicle tires, the carbon emission factor method was employed. Carbon emission models and carbon emission-reduction inventories were developed for the tire production, transportation, use, and recycling stages. Specifically, models and inventories were constructed for four treatment methods: Tire retreading, reclaimed rubber production, reclaimed rubber powder production, and pyrolysis, encompassing eight distinct processes: Hot retreading, cold retreading, atmospheric continuous desulfurization, screw extrusion, ambient grinding, cryogenic grinding, atmospheric pyrolysis, and vacuum pyrolysis. The carbon emissions, carbon reduction, net carbon surplus, and carbon reduction rate for each treatment method and process were calculated. Furthermore, sensitivity and economic analyses were conducted on the material mass and energy consumption in the production stage, which impact the total carbon emissions. The results indicate that among the four recycling methods, tire retreading production demonstrates the highest carbon reduction efficiency, followed by reclaimed rubber and reclaimed rubber powder production, while pyrolysis shows the lowest efficiency. Among the eight processes, cold retreading exhibits the most significant carbon reduction effect, with a carbon reduction rate of 59.30%. The ranking of carbon reduction efficiency is as follows: Cold Retreading > Hot Retreading > Ambient Grinding > Atmospheric Continuous Desulfurization > Screw Extrusion >Atmospheric Pyrolysis > Vacuum Pyrolysis > Cryogenic Grinding. Sensitivity analysis reveals a positive correlation between the material mass and energy consumption required in the production stage and the total carbon emissions; however, the impact of material mass on total carbon emissions is significantly greater than that of energy consumption.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Heilongjiang Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.